The number of new medical devices cleared by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) through the 510(k) pathway that has subsequently been associated with safety risks has led to discussion of approaches to regulation and communication of device risks. As debate continues over whether the pathway needs to be altered, features of ethical use of 510(k)-cleared devices can include (1) heightened caution with respect to newly cleared 510(k) products until adequate data are gathered through postmarket surveillance, (2) facilitating informed consent by improving physician and patient knowledge of the 510(k) pathway, and (3) basing distribution of these devices on individual risk assessments while ensuring equitable access.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/amajethics.2021.673 | DOI Listing |
Front Med Technol
November 2024
Advance Academic Programs, Krieger School of Arts and Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Washington, DC, United States.
In recent years, the Artificial Intelligence (AI) has enabled conventional Combination Devices (CDs) to innovate in healthcare merging with technology sectors. However, the challenges like reliance on predicate devices in US Food and Drug Administration (FDA's 510(k) pathway, especially for perpetually updating AI are stressed. Though the European Union (EU's new Medical Device Regulations address software and AI, fitting adaptive algorithms into conformity assessments remains difficult.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCan Urol Assoc J
October 2024
Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Introduction: Focal therapy is an emerging treatment for localized prostate cancer. The objectives of this review were to: 1) review how focal therapies are regulated and approved; 2) summarize the scope and quality of the literature regarding safety, efficacy, and side-effects; and 3) outline ongoing clinical trials of focal therapy in Canada.
Methods: Using the PRISMA framework for scoping reviews, we searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane from 2021-2024, complementing Hopstaken et al's search up functional and oncologic outcomes.
Ann Intern Med
November 2024
Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale New Haven Hospital, Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, and Department of Health Policy and Management, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut (H.M.K.).
Expert Rev Med Devices
September 2024
Fraunhofer Institute for Toxicology and Experimental Medicine, Nikolai-Fuchs-Straße 1, Hannover, Germany.
Background: This study aims to facilitate the identification of similar devices for both, the European Medical Device Regulation (MDR) and the US 510(k) equivalence pathway by leveraging existing data. Both are related to the regulatory pathway of read across for chemicals, where toxicological data from a known substance is transferred to one under investigation, as they aim to streamline the accreditation process for new devices and chemicals.
Research Design And Methods: This study employs latent semantic analysis to generate similarity values, harnessing the US Food and Drug Administration 510k-database, utilizing their 'Device Descriptions' and 'Intended Use' statements.
Curr Probl Cardiol
November 2024
Temple University Lewis Katz School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, United States. Electronic address:
Background: Medical device expenditures have increased in the 21st century, with cardiac devices comprising an outsized portion of the market. Meanwhile, the disproportionate share of FDA recalls of cardiac devices is often overshadowed. Using the FDA 510(k) premarket notification pathway and FDA recalls issued from 2000 to 2020, this project seeks to engage our understanding of innovation and recalls in the cardiac device space.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!