Objective: To evaluate the prognostic significance of detectable circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) V600E/K mutations in patients with advanced melanoma enrolled in a clinical trial without -targeted therapy.

Patients And Methods: V600E/K mutation status was determined on archived tissue and pretreatment stored plasma from 149 patients with unresectable stage IV melanoma who were enrolled between May 5, 2010 and May 2, 2014 in the North Central Cancer Treatment Group/Alliance N0879 randomized phase 2 clinical trial. Results were reported as presence or absence of cfDNA V600E/K detection of assay vs tissue. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed for patients with and without detectable mutation.

Results: In total, 63 of 149 (42.3%) patients had V600E/K results for tissue and blood, and 20 of 63 (31.7%) patients had tissue-diagnosed mutant . Of these, 11 of 20 (55.0%) patients had detectable plasma cfDNA . Among patients with tissue-mutant V600E/K, PFS and OS were shorter for those with corresponding cfDNA mutations (PFS, 5.8 vs 12.0 months; =.051; OS, 9.2 vs 27.1 months; =.054). Our assay demonstrated sensitivity of 55% (95% CI, 0.322 to 0.768), specificity of 97.7% (95% CI, 0.932 to 1.000), positive predictive value of 91.7% (95% CI, 0.760 to 1.000), and negative predictive value of 82.4% (95% CI, 0.719 to 0.928).

Conclusion: In advanced melanoma, detectable cfDNA V600E/K mutation is present in about half the patients with stage IV with -mutant melanoma tumor tissue and appears to confer a poorer prognosis when detectable. Given the poorer prognosis, cfDNA can be used to risk-stratify patients with metastatic melanoma in practice or clinical trials. clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00976573.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8526905PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2021.05.003DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cfdna v600e/k
12
patients
9
cell-free dna
8
advanced melanoma
8
melanoma enrolled
8
clinical trial
8
v600e/k mutation
8
patients detectable
8
poorer prognosis
8
cfdna
6

Similar Publications

Objective: To evaluate the prognostic significance of detectable circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) V600E/K mutations in patients with advanced melanoma enrolled in a clinical trial without -targeted therapy.

Patients And Methods: V600E/K mutation status was determined on archived tissue and pretreatment stored plasma from 149 patients with unresectable stage IV melanoma who were enrolled between May 5, 2010 and May 2, 2014 in the North Central Cancer Treatment Group/Alliance N0879 randomized phase 2 clinical trial. Results were reported as presence or absence of cfDNA V600E/K detection of assay vs tissue.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) may complement radiography for interim assessment of patients with cancer.

Objective: Our objective was to explore the relationship between changes in plasma ctDNA versus radiographic imaging among patients with metastatic melanoma.

Methods: Using the Idylla system, we measured B-Raf proto-oncogene (BRAF) V600 ctDNA in plasma from 15 patients with BRAF V600E/K-positive primary tumors undergoing standard-of-care monitoring, including cross-sectional computed tomography (CT) imaging.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: We tested the hypothesis that a 4-month course of adjuvant dabrafenib in stage IIIC BRAF-mutated melanoma would improve 2 year RFS from 24% to 51%, and that tumor-derived cell free DNA (cfDNA) in plasma would correlate with and predict recurrence.

Methods: Patients with stage IIIC BRAF V600E/K mutated melanoma who were free of disease after surgical resection received 4 months of adjuvant dabrafenib. Patients were evaluated with imaging at baseline, at the end of cycles 2, 4, 6, then every 3 months until disease relapse or 2 years, whichever came first.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Phase II trial (BREAK-2) of the BRAF inhibitor dabrafenib (GSK2118436) in patients with metastatic melanoma.

J Clin Oncol

September 2013

Paolo A. Ascierto, Ester Simeone, Instituto Nazionale Tumori Fondazione "G. Pascale," Napoli, Italy; David Minor, California Pacific Center for Melanoma Research and Treatment, San Francisco; Antoni Ribas, Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Los Angeles; Omid Hamid, Experimental Therapeutics/Immunotherapy, The Angeles Clinic and Research Institute, Los Angeles, CA; Anne O'Hagan, Niki Arya, Mary Guckert, Anne-Marie Martin, Jolly Mazumdar, Vicki L. Goodman, GlaxoSmithKline Oncology, Collegeville; Ravi Amaravadi, Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Kevin B. Kim, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Celeste Lebbe, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Saint Louis, Paris, Université Paris Diderot, Paris; Jean-Jacques Grob, Aix-Marseille University, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, Hôpital Timone, Marseille, France; Dirk Schadendorf, University Hospital Essen, Essen; Tabea Wilhelm, Uwe Trefzer, Charité-Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany; Richard F. Kefford, Georgina V. Long, Westmead Hospital and Melanoma Institute Australia, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

Purpose: Dabrafenib (GSK2118436) is a potent inhibitor of mutated BRAF kinase. Our multicenter, single-arm, phase II study assessed the safety and clinical activity of dabrafenib in BRAF(V600E/K) mutation-positive metastatic melanoma (mut(+) MM).

Patients And Methods: Histologically confirmed patients with stage IV BRAF(V600E/K) mut(+) MM received oral dabrafenib 150 mg twice daily until disease progression, death, or unacceptable adverse events (AEs).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!