Background: Lignocaine with adrenaline is routinely used as a local anesthetic for dental procedures. Adrenaline was added to increase the duration of anesthesia. However, epinephrine containing a local anesthetic solution is not recommended in conditions such as advanced cardiovascular diseases and hyperthyroidism. Recently, ropivacaine has gained popularity as a long-acting anesthetic with superior outcomes. The goal of this study was to assess and compare the effectiveness of 0.75% ropivacaine alone and 2% lignocaine with adrenaline (1:80,000) in the removal of bilateral maxillary wisdom teeth using the posterior superior alveolar nerve block technique.
Methods: This was a single-blind, randomized, split-mouth, prospective study assessing 15 systemically sound outpatients who needed bilateral removal of maxillary third molars. We randomly allocated the sides and sequences of ropivacaine and lignocaine with adrenaline administration. We evaluated the efficacy of both anesthetics with regard to the onset of anesthesia, intensity of pain, variation in heart rate, and blood pressure.
Results: The onset of anesthesia was faster with lignocaine (138 s) than with ropivacaine (168 s), with insignificant differences (p = 0.001). There was no need for additional local anesthetics in the ropivacaine group, while in the lignocaine with adrenaline group, 2 (13.3%) patients required additional anesthesia. Adequate intraoperative anesthesia was provided by ropivacaine and lignocaine solutions. No significant difference was observed in the perioperative variation in blood pressure and heart rate.
Conclusion: Ropivacaine (0.75%) is a safe and an adrenaline-free local anesthetic option for posterior superior alveolar nerve block, which provides adequate intraoperative anesthesia and a stable hemodynamic profile for the removal of the maxillary third molar.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8520834 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.17245/jdapm.2021.21.5.451 | DOI Listing |
Anesth Analg
December 2024
From the Department of Anesthesiology, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin Province, China.
Front Vet Sci
November 2024
Department of Veterinary Science, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
JBJS Essent Surg Tech
November 2024
Department of Orthopaedics Foot and Ankle Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
BMC Oral Health
October 2024
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, College &Hospital of Stomatology, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, 530021, China.
Introduction: This study aims to compare the efficacy of ropivacaine and lidocaine in the treatment of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disorders, with the goal of exploring a more effective treatment for TMJ disorders.
Methods: Patients with Wilkes stage III and IV unilateral TMJ disorders were enrolled in the study. 0.
J Pain Res
October 2024
Department of Anesthesiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.
Background: Patients undergoing laparoscopic renal surgery often experience significant postoperative pain. Quadratus lumborum block (QLB) provides effective postoperative pain control after laparoscopic procedures, while lidocaine administered intravenously also exerts analgesic effects for surgical patients. We design this trial to compare the effects of i.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!