AI Article Synopsis

  • A 5-week randomized double-blind study (EMERGENT-1) tested the safety and effectiveness of KarXT, a treatment for schizophrenia, using remote ratings from audio-recorded PANSS interviews with patients experiencing acute psychosis.
  • Independent raters showed a high correlation between their ratings and site-based assessments, reinforcing the validity of the findings.
  • The study found that the KarXT group had significantly greater improvement in symptoms compared to the placebo group, and the method of remote assessment may benefit future studies aiming to enhance rating accuracy.

Article Abstract

Blinded, site-independent (remote) ratings from audio-digital recordings of site-based Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) interviews were obtained in a 5-week, randomized, double-blinded study assessing the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of KarXT (a fixed combination of xanomeline and trospium chloride) in hospitalized adults with schizophrenia experiencing an acute exacerbation of psychosis (EMERGENT-1; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT3697252). The blinded site-independent raters had no knowledge of site location, study visit, drug vs. placebo assignment, or any treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Concordance analyses of 561 paired site-based and site-independent PANSS ratings across all visits revealed a high correlation (ICC = 0.775). Paired scoring differences were positively correlated with the PANSS total score (Spearman's rho = 0.37, p < 0.0001). Paired PANSS scores were available from 148 subjects at both the baseline and end of study visits (KarXT = 72, Placebo = 76). Site-based PANSS total scores (primary aim) revealed a significantly greater improvement from baseline in the KarXT group compared to the placebo group (p < 0.0001). The blinded site-independent PANSS total scores derived from listening to and scoring the recorded site-based PANSS interviews replicated this finding (p < 0.001) and yielded an overall predictive value of 85.1% for matching the site-based response/non-response outcomes. TEAE's have the potential to "unblind" site-based ratings. In this study, the site-independent raters were blinded to TEAEs, affirmed the site-based PANSS ratings, and mitigated concerns about possible functional unblinding of site-based raters. This method of blinded assessment via audio-digital recordings may have utility for other studies concerned with ratings precision and/or functional unblinding.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2021.10.027DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

panss ratings
8
blinded site-independent
8
site-independent
4
site-independent confirmation
4
confirmation primary
4
primary site-based
4
panss
4
site-based panss
4
ratings schizophrenia
4
schizophrenia trial
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!