AI Article Synopsis

  • Most speech-language pathologists (SLPs) recognize the value of language sample analysis (LSA) for improving therapy with children who have developmental language disorder (DLD), but they rarely use it due to various barriers.
  • A study involving Dutch SLPs identified key obstacles to LSA use, including a lack of knowledge, time constraints, and inadequate financial support, and proposed training to help SLPs overcome these issues.
  • Despite the training, SLPs still did not incorporate LSA into their practices more frequently, indicating that solutions like user-friendly software or shorter sample tasks are necessary to address the ongoing time investment challenge.

Article Abstract

Purpose: Most speech-language pathologists (SLPs) working with children with developmental language disorder (DLD) do not perform language sample analysis (LSA) on a regular basis, although they do regard LSA as highly informative for goal setting and evaluating grammatical therapy. The primary aim of this study was to identify facilitators, barriers, and needs related to performing LSA by Dutch SLPs working with children with DLD. The secondary aim was to investigate whether a training would change the actual performance of LSA.

Method: A focus group with 11 SLPs working in Dutch speech-language pathology practices was conducted. Barriers, facilitators, and needs were identified using thematic analysis and categorized using the theoretical domain framework. To address the barriers, a training was developed using software program CLAN. Changes in barriers and use of LSA were evaluated with a survey sent to participants before, directly after, and 3 months posttraining.

Results: The barriers reported in the focus group were SLPs' lack of knowledge and skills, time investment, negative beliefs about their capabilities, differences in beliefs about their professional role, and no reimbursement from health insurance companies. Posttraining survey results revealed that LSA was not performed more often in daily practice. Using CLAN was not the solution according to participating SLPs. Time investment remained a huge barrier.

Conclusions: A training in performing LSA did not resolve the time investment barrier experienced by SLPs. User-friendly software, developed in codesign with SLPs might provide a solution. For the short-term, shorter samples, preferably from narrative tasks, should be considered.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/2021_LSHSS-21-00026DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

slps working
12
time investment
12
language sample
8
sample analysis
8
barriers facilitators
8
working children
8
performing lsa
8
focus group
8
barriers
6
slps
6

Similar Publications

Focusing on the mechanism of glycinin-soybean lipophilic protein hybrid gels: Effect of ultrasonic, subunit interactions, and formation process analysis.

Ultrason Sonochem

January 2025

Department of Food Engineering, Heilongjiang Key Laboratory of Food Science and Engineering, Heilongjiang Key Laboratory of Grain Food and Comprehensive Processing, Harbin University of Commerce, Harbin 150028, Heilongjiang, China. Electronic address:

Heat facilitates aggregation and gel formation of soybean proteins. Ultrasonic reduces the size of protein aggregates. This study examined the impact of glycinin (11S) subunits on soybean lipophilic proteins (SLPs) gel formation and underlying mechanisms.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Synthetic long peptides (SLPs) are a promising vaccine modality that exploit dendritic cells (DC) to treat chronic infections or cancer. Currently, the design of SLPs relies on in silico prediction and multifactorial T cells assays to determine which SLPs are best cross-presented on DC human leukocyte antigen class I (HLA-I). Furthermore, it is unknown how TLR ligand-based adjuvants affect DC cross-presentation.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Vocal Health in SLPs: Easier Said Than Done.

J Voice

January 2025

Graduate School, Department of Speech and Language Therapy, Anadolu University, Eskişehir, Türkiye. Electronic address:

Objectives: As professional voice users, speech and language pathologists (SLPs) follow vocal hygiene behaviors both in the rehabilitation of voice disorders and in preventive interventions to reduce the risk among healthy users. However, it is curious to what extent SLPs adhere to vocal hygiene and healthy vocal behaviors and how this affects vocal fatigue. This study aims to investigate the extent to which SLPs perform vocal hygiene behaviors, their levels of vocal hygiene, and vocal fatigue.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The purpose of this study was to explore what speech-language pathologists (SLPs) who are AAC specialists see as advantages and disadvantages of providing AAC services via telehealth, how well tele-AAC assessments align with guidelines for in-person assessments, and how SLPs' perspectives of tele-AAC services changed post-COVID. Fifteen SLPs who are AAC specialists and experienced working with people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis watched videos of speech generating device (SGD) assessments conducted via telehealth for eight people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Using a checklist based on the AAC Clinical Assessment Project (AAC-CAP), the SLPs rated how comparable remote assessment was to in-person assessment, and described advantages and challenges.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Evidence-based practices (EBPs) use evidence (external and internal), clinician expertise, and client/caregiver perspectives to deliver effective, individualized care. Each component of EBP is highly relevant and most effective when implemented together. Families with cultural or linguistic backgrounds different from the mainstream experience inequitable treatment across all disciplines.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!