AI Article Synopsis

  • - Organised cervical cancer screening in Estonia began in 2006, but participation remains low, so a study was conducted in 2020 to test the feasibility and acceptance of HPV self-sampling among women who had not attended screening.
  • - A randomised intervention study involved 12,000 women born between 1958-1983, with varying methods of receiving self-sampling kits; the results showed a 16% overall participation rate, significantly higher in the opt-out group compared to the opt-in groups.
  • - Findings indicated that self-sampling was well-received, with 98% of participants finding it easy to use and 88% expressing preference for it in future screenings, highlighting its potential to increase cervical

Article Abstract

Objective: Organised cervical cancer screening was started in Estonia in 2006, but participation is still low. Human papillomavirus (HPV) self-sampling has proved to increase screening uptake. This study addressed the feasibility of HPV self-sampling and the acceptance of this method among long-term screening non-attenders.

Methods: A randomised intervention study was conducted in Estonia in 2020. Women born in 1958-1983 without a Pap smear in 2013-2019 were identified in the Estonian Health Insurance Fund database. From them, 12,000 women were randomly allocated to three equal-sized study groups. The opt-out group received a questionnaire and a Qvintip® sampling device by regular mail. Two opt-in groups received a questionnaire and an e-mail invitation to order a self-sampler online; one received Qvintip and the other Evalyn® Brush. Participantś background characteristics were obtained from the Population Register. The effect of covariates on participation rate was estimated with multivariate Poisson regression. Acceptance of self-sampling was analysed according to agreement with statements in the questionnaire.

Results: The overall participation rate was 16% with significant differences between opt-out (26%) and opt-in (11%) groups. Compared to the opt-out Qvintip group, adjusted relative risks for the Qvintip and Evalyn Brush opt-in groups were 0.41 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.37-0.45) and 0.44 (95% CI 0.40-0.49), respectively. Participation was associated with living place, citizenship, and education. Self-sampling was well accepted: 98% agreed that it was easy to use, 88% preferred it as a screening method in future.

Conclusions: The results show the feasibility and good acceptance of HPV self-sampling among long-term screening non-attenders in Estonia.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/09691413211052499DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

hpv self-sampling
12
human papillomavirus
8
self-sampling long-term
8
cervical cancer
8
cancer screening
8
long-term screening
8
received questionnaire
8
opt-in groups
8
participation rate
8
self-sampling
6

Similar Publications

: Implementing self-sampling (SS) in cervical cancer screening requires comparable results to clinician-collected samples (CCS). Agreement measures are essential for evaluating HPV test performance. Previous studies on non-paired samples have reported higher viral cycle threshold (Ct) values in SS compared to CCS, affecting sensitivity for detecting cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse (CIN2+).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Understanding why Arab American women have lower adherence to cervical cancer screening compared to other racial/ethnic groups is important. The study aimed to understand attitudes and knowledge of cervical cancer prevention and HPV vaccination among Arab American women.

Methods: A mixed-method approach was employed, including nine focus groups and an online questionnaire.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Are we ready for self-sampling for cervical cancer screening? Insights from service providers and policy makers in Nepal.

PLOS Glob Public Health

January 2025

Britain Nepal Medical Trust, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (UK), London, United Kingdom.

Cervical cancer is the leading cancer among women in Nepal, but the country has very low screening rate, with only 8.2% of women being screened. In recent years, a self-sampling kit for testing for the human papillomavirus (HPV) has been developed to allow self-sampling and enable early detection of cervical abnormalities.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: With the transition from cytology to human papilloma virus (HPV) testing in cervical cancer screening, it is possible to use self-sampling instead of professionally collected samples. Most studies have included women between 20 and 60 years age. Here we aimed to study postmenopausal women and investigate whether vaginal self-sampling is equally effective as professional sampling for detection of HSIL and the possibility to use a method for molecular triage directly on the screening sample.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Monitoring trends in diseases after the implementation of new public health interventions or policy changes is crucial for public health planning and surveillance. In this study we look at variations in rates of cervical cancer and grade-3 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN3) incidence between 2006 and 2020 in England and relate them to predictions based on the changes in HPV vaccination and cervical screening policy.

Methods: Using population-based registry data, we estimated incidence rates and their 95% confidence intervals for cervical cancer and CIN3 by age group and by either year of diagnosis or 1-year birth cohort.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!