Objective: Organised cervical cancer screening was started in Estonia in 2006, but participation is still low. Human papillomavirus (HPV) self-sampling has proved to increase screening uptake. This study addressed the feasibility of HPV self-sampling and the acceptance of this method among long-term screening non-attenders.
Methods: A randomised intervention study was conducted in Estonia in 2020. Women born in 1958-1983 without a Pap smear in 2013-2019 were identified in the Estonian Health Insurance Fund database. From them, 12,000 women were randomly allocated to three equal-sized study groups. The opt-out group received a questionnaire and a Qvintip® sampling device by regular mail. Two opt-in groups received a questionnaire and an e-mail invitation to order a self-sampler online; one received Qvintip and the other Evalyn® Brush. Participantś background characteristics were obtained from the Population Register. The effect of covariates on participation rate was estimated with multivariate Poisson regression. Acceptance of self-sampling was analysed according to agreement with statements in the questionnaire.
Results: The overall participation rate was 16% with significant differences between opt-out (26%) and opt-in (11%) groups. Compared to the opt-out Qvintip group, adjusted relative risks for the Qvintip and Evalyn Brush opt-in groups were 0.41 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.37-0.45) and 0.44 (95% CI 0.40-0.49), respectively. Participation was associated with living place, citizenship, and education. Self-sampling was well accepted: 98% agreed that it was easy to use, 88% preferred it as a screening method in future.
Conclusions: The results show the feasibility and good acceptance of HPV self-sampling among long-term screening non-attenders in Estonia.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/09691413211052499 | DOI Listing |
Cancers (Basel)
December 2024
Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), 28029 Madrid, Spain.
: Implementing self-sampling (SS) in cervical cancer screening requires comparable results to clinician-collected samples (CCS). Agreement measures are essential for evaluating HPV test performance. Previous studies on non-paired samples have reported higher viral cycle threshold (Ct) values in SS compared to CCS, affecting sensitivity for detecting cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse (CIN2+).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCancers (Basel)
December 2024
Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health, 1415 Washington Heights, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Background: Understanding why Arab American women have lower adherence to cervical cancer screening compared to other racial/ethnic groups is important. The study aimed to understand attitudes and knowledge of cervical cancer prevention and HPV vaccination among Arab American women.
Methods: A mixed-method approach was employed, including nine focus groups and an online questionnaire.
PLOS Glob Public Health
January 2025
Britain Nepal Medical Trust, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (UK), London, United Kingdom.
Cervical cancer is the leading cancer among women in Nepal, but the country has very low screening rate, with only 8.2% of women being screened. In recent years, a self-sampling kit for testing for the human papillomavirus (HPV) has been developed to allow self-sampling and enable early detection of cervical abnormalities.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol
January 2025
Department of Women's Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
Objective: With the transition from cytology to human papilloma virus (HPV) testing in cervical cancer screening, it is possible to use self-sampling instead of professionally collected samples. Most studies have included women between 20 and 60 years age. Here we aimed to study postmenopausal women and investigate whether vaginal self-sampling is equally effective as professional sampling for detection of HSIL and the possibility to use a method for molecular triage directly on the screening sample.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFLancet Reg Health Eur
February 2025
Centre for Cancer Screening, Prevention and Early Diagnosis, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Background: Monitoring trends in diseases after the implementation of new public health interventions or policy changes is crucial for public health planning and surveillance. In this study we look at variations in rates of cervical cancer and grade-3 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN3) incidence between 2006 and 2020 in England and relate them to predictions based on the changes in HPV vaccination and cervical screening policy.
Methods: Using population-based registry data, we estimated incidence rates and their 95% confidence intervals for cervical cancer and CIN3 by age group and by either year of diagnosis or 1-year birth cohort.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!