Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Soil aggregates (SA) play crucial roles in soil organic carbon (SOC) sequestration. Different SA fractions contribute differently to the sequestration of SOC. However, few studies have examined the factors controlling SA fractions and associated SOC contents across a watershed. Soil samples were collected at 0-10 cm (surface layer) and 10-20 cm (subsurface layer) from 88 sites across a semi-humid watershed (1.1 km) on the Loess Plateau, China. These samples were separated into macroaggregates (MA), microaggregates (MI), and silt + clay fractions (SC) by wet-sieving, and SOC content of each fraction was determined. The objectives were to: 1) investigate the spatial variability of SA fractions and associated SOC contents as well as their main controls across an entire watershed, and 2) explore the linkages between soil aggregation and SOC sequestration. The bulk and aggregate SOC contents of all SA fractions showed moderate variability, with coefficient of variations of 23.3-31.9%. Geostatistical analysis indicated that the spatial patterns of SA fractions and SOC content varied with aggregate size. From combined Spearman's correlation analysis and structural equation modelling, we found that soil texture was an important control on the spatial variability of all SA fractions and associated SOC contents. Vegetation dynamics and management practices associated with land use were also important controls on MA and MI and their associated SOC contents, especially in the surface layer. However, SC and its associated SOC content were more sensitive to eco-hydrological processes related to topography. Among the land uses, grassland had the greatest SOC sequestration potential. The fine roots of herbs can wrap MI in MA and increase SOC content within MA, which is the primary mechanism responsible for SOC sequestration in grasslands. These results indicate that using vegetation with fine root systems for restoration is a good strategy to increase SOC sequestration in this region.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151155 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!