Background: Ankle periprosthetic joint infections are rising in number, but an evidence-based gold standard treatment has not been defined yet.
Methods: We made a systematic review about the operative treatment of infections following total ankle arthroplasty. Proportional meta-analysis was used to summarize effects of the surgical techniques included. Primary outcome of this study was infection eradication, followed by complications, re-interventions, amputation rates and functions.
Results: We included six studies(113 patients) reporting 6 types of surgical interventions, mostly irrigation and debridement (35.4%) and two-stage revisions (24.8%). No differences among all analyzed techniques were found in the infection eradication outcome as well as in the secondary outcomes. Patients receiving a permanent spacer are most likely to end up with amputation.
Conclusions: Literature dealing with infections after total ankle replacement is currently composed by few low-quality articles. The overlapping of confidence intervals related to all analyzed interventions showed no superiority of either technique.
Level Of Evidence: III.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fas.2021.10.008 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!