Is debridement really the best we can do for periprosthetic joint infections following total ankle replacements? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Foot Ankle Surg

IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi (Centro di Chirurgia Ricostruttiva e delle Infezioni Osteoarticolari - CRIO Unit), via Riccardo Galeazzi 4, 20161 Milano, Italy. Electronic address:

Published: August 2022

Background: Ankle periprosthetic joint infections are rising in number, but an evidence-based gold standard treatment has not been defined yet.

Methods: We made a systematic review about the operative treatment of infections following total ankle arthroplasty. Proportional meta-analysis was used to summarize effects of the surgical techniques included. Primary outcome of this study was infection eradication, followed by complications, re-interventions, amputation rates and functions.

Results: We included six studies(113 patients) reporting 6 types of surgical interventions, mostly irrigation and debridement (35.4%) and two-stage revisions (24.8%). No differences among all analyzed techniques were found in the infection eradication outcome as well as in the secondary outcomes. Patients receiving a permanent spacer are most likely to end up with amputation.

Conclusions: Literature dealing with infections after total ankle replacement is currently composed by few low-quality articles. The overlapping of confidence intervals related to all analyzed interventions showed no superiority of either technique.

Level Of Evidence: III.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fas.2021.10.008DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

infections total
12
total ankle
12
periprosthetic joint
8
joint infections
8
systematic review
8
infection eradication
8
debridement best
4
best periprosthetic
4
infections
4
ankle
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!