Elevation Transposition Method for Superficialization of the Basilic Vein Achieves Better Patency Rate than Tunnel Transposition.

Background: To compare the tunnel transposition and elevation transposition methods used for superficialization of the basilic vein in terms of complication and patency rates.

Methods: This retrospective study included patients who underwent 2-stage basilic vein transposition between August 2016 and December 2019. Patients were categorized into brachial-basilic fistula tunnel transposition (n = 32) and elevation transposition (n = 21) groups using medical records. Primary patency was defined as a conduit that remains patent without any re-intervention to maintain patency. Primary assisted patency was defined as a conduit that has undergone intervention to maintain patency but has never been thrombosed.

Results: The distribution of baseline characteristics was similar between the 2 groups. Coronary artery disease was the only variable that was significantly different between the tunnel transposition and elevation transposition groups (31.1% vs. 4.8%, P = 0.035). The tunnel transposition group had a greater amount of blood loss (P < 0.001) and a longer period of hospitalization (P = 0.002) than the elevation transposition group. The rates of suture repair to stop bleeding from the conduit was significantly different between the tunnel transposition and elevation transposition groups (31.8% vs. 4.8%, P = 0.035), whereas those of other complications were not significantly different. The elevation transposition group had a significantly higher primary patency rate than the tunneled transposition group (P = 0.033); however, primary assisted patency was achieved in all patients (100%) in both groups.

Conclusion: Elevation transposition might be a more reliable method than tunnel transposition for superficialization of a basilic venous fistula.