Determining optimal positive end-expiratory pressure and tidal volume in children by intratidal compliance: a prospective observational study.

Br J Anaesth

Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. Electronic address:

Published: January 2022

Background: Limited data exist regarding optimal intraoperative ventilation strategies for the paediatric population. This study aimed to determine the optimal combination of PEEP and tidal volume (V) based on intratidal compliance profiles in healthy young children undergoing general anaesthesia.

Methods: During anaesthesia, infants (1 month-1 yr), toddlers (1-3 yr), and children (3-6 yr) were assigned serially to four ventilator settings: PEEP 8 cm HO/V 8 ml kg (PEEP8/V8), PEEP 10 cm HO/V 5 ml kg (PEEP10/V5), PEEP 10 cm HO/V 8 ml kg (PEEP10/V8), and PEEP 12 cm HO/V 5 ml kg (PEEP12/V5). The primary outcome was intratidal compliance profile, classified at each ventilator setting as horizontal (indicative of optimal alveolar ventilatory conditions), increasing, decreasing, or combinations of increasing/decreasing/horizontal compliance. Secondary outcomes were peak inspiratory, plateau, and driving pressures.

Results: Intratidal compliance was measured in 15 infants, 13 toddlers, and 15 children (15/43 [35%] females). A horizontal compliance profile was most frequently observed with PEEP10/V5 (60.5%), compared with PEEP10/V8, PEEP8/V8, and PEEP12/V5 (23.3-34.9%; P<0.001). Decreasing compliance profiles were most frequent when V increased to 8 ml kg, PEEP increased to 12 cm HO, or both. Plateau airway pressures were lower at PEEP8/V8 (16.9 cm HO [2.2]) and PEEP10/V5 (16.7 cm HO [1.7]), compared with PEEP10/V8 (19.5 cm HO [2.1]) and PEEP12/V5 (19.0 cm HO [2.0]; P<0.001). Driving pressure was lowest with PEEP10/V5 (4.6 cm HO), compared with other combinations (7.0 cm HO [2.0]-9.5 cm HO [2.1]; P<0.001).

Conclusions: V 5 ml kg combined with 10 cm HO PEEP may reduce atelectasis and overdistension, and minimise driving pressure in the majority of mechanically ventilated children <6 yr. The effect of these PEEP and V settings on postoperative pulmonary complications in children undergoing surgery requires further study.

Clinical Trial Registration: NCT04633720.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2021.09.024DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

intratidal compliance
16
peep ho/v
16
tidal volume
8
compliance profile
8
compliance
6
peep
5
determining optimal
4
optimal positive
4
positive end-expiratory
4
end-expiratory pressure
4

Similar Publications

Purpose Of Review: Determining the optimal positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) setting remains a central yet debated issue in the management of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).The 'best compliance' strategy set the PEEP to coincide with the peak respiratory system compliance (or 2 cmH 2 O higher) during a decremental PEEP trial, but evidence is conflicting.

Recent Findings: The physiological rationale that best compliance is always representative of functional residual capacity and recruitment has raised serious concerns about its efficacy and safety, due to its association with increased 28-day all-cause mortality in a randomized clinical trial in ARDS patients.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: During mechanical ventilation, cyclic recruitment and derecruitment (R/D) of alveoli result in focal points of heterogeneous stress throughout the lung. In the acutely injured lung, the rates at which alveoli can be recruited or derecruited may also be altered, requiring longer times at higher pressure levels to be recruited during inspiration, but shorter times at lower pressure levels to minimize collapse during exhalation. In this study, we used a computational model to simulate the effects of airway pressure release ventilation (APRV) on acinar recruitment, with varying inspiratory pressure levels and durations of exhalation.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: In ARDS, the PEEP level associated with the best respiratory system compliance is often selected; however, intra-tidal recruitment can increase compliance, falsely suggesting improvement in baseline mechanics. Tidal lung hysteresis increases with intra-tidal recruitment and can help interpreting changes in compliance. This study aims to assess tidal recruitment in ARDS patients and to test a combined approach, based on tidal hysteresis and compliance, to interpret decremental PEEP trials.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Intratidal compliance of the lung and the total respiratory system.

Physiol Meas

September 2022

Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany.

The worldwide rising quantity of surgeries and the corresponding need of mechanical ventilation means a rising number of patients are at risk of suffering from post-operative pulmonary complications. To prevent this risk, individual mechanics of the lung should be considered when setting the parameters of mechanical ventilation. Intratidal compliance analysis based on transpulmonal pressure would provide an estimate for individual lung mechanics.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: The positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) level with best respiratory system compliance (Crs) is frequently used for PEEP selection in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients. On occasion, two similar best Crs (where the difference between the Crs of two PEEP levels is < 1 ml/cm HO) may be identified during decremental PEEP titration. Selecting PEEP under such conditions is challenging.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!