The effects of two-handed jaw thrust on i-gel™ placement in anesthetized non-paralyzed patients.

Minerva Anestesiol

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine and Anesthesia and Pain Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea -

Published: October 2021

Background: I-gel is a second-generation supraglottic airway device with a non-inflatable cuff. In this prospective randomized investigation, we evaluated the effects of two-handed jaw thrust technique on i-gel insertion in anesthetized non-paralyzed patients.

Methods: Seventy-four adult patients were allocated to two groups (N.=37 each). In the jaw thrust group, two-handed jaw thrust technique was applied to facilitate i-gel insertion. In the control group, conventional i-gel insertion was performed. The success rate at the first attempt, air leakage pressure, insertion time, and postoperative sore throat incidence were recorded.

Results: The success rate at the first attempt was higher in the jaw thrust group (37 [100%] vs. 31 [84%], difference of 16%, 95% confidence interval for the difference: 1 to 33%, P=0.03). The median air leakage pressure was higher in the jaw thrust group than in the control group (20 [interquartile range 13] vs. 17 [interquartile range 3] cmH2O, difference: 6, 95% confidence interval of the difference: 3 to 8, P<0.01). The mean insertion time was shorter in the jaw thrust group (27±14 vs. 41±29 seconds, difference: 14 seconds, 95% confidence interval of the difference: 3 to 24, P=0.01). The incidence of postoperative sore throat at the postoperative one hour was lower in the jaw thrust group (seven [20%] vs. 15 [41%], difference 22%, 95% confidence interval for the difference: -1 to 42%, P=0.04).

Conclusions: The two-handed jaw thrust technique facilitated i-gel insertion compared to the conventional technique in anesthetized non-paralyzed patients.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.23736/S0375-9393.21.15696-2DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

jaw thrust
24
two-handed jaw
12
i-gel insertion
12
thrust group
12
effects two-handed
8
anesthetized non-paralyzed
8
thrust technique
8
control group
8
success rate
8
rate attempt
8

Similar Publications

Hypoxia is not uncommon in elderly patients during painless gastrointestinal endoscopy. This study aimed to determine the effectiveness of transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation (TEAS) in reducing the occurrence of hypoxia symptoms in elderly patients. Patients were randomly and equally grouped into sham control ( = 109) or TEAS group ( = 109) by using the random number table method.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Tactical Combat Casualty Care (TCCC) has been designated by the U.S. Department of Defense as the military standard for battlefield trauma care.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Interrater reliability of different scoring systems for drug-induced sleep endoscopy.

Sleep Breath

November 2024

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Kantonsspital Baselland, Liestal, Switzerland.

Purpose: To explore the interobserver reliability of drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) for patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) of two classification systems.

Methods: DISE examinations were recorded digitally for all patients and were evaluated independently by five examiners blinded to all patient data. Areas of obstruction were rated using VOTE (velum, oropharynx lateral wall, tongue base, epiglottis) classification and PTLTbE (palate, tonsils, lateral pharyngeal wall, tongue base, epiglottis) classification.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The jaw thrust maneuver is a fundamental airway management tool to prevent the tongue from obstructing the upper airway in unconscious patients. Known complications of the jaw thrust maneuver include spinal cord injury if the cervical spine is unstable and exacerbation of an existing mandibular injury. However, this procedure is frequently associated with pain, and the associated consequences, especially the parasympathetic response, are rarely seen or discussed.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The study looked at how safe it is for Physician Assistants to give sedation to kids during painful medical procedures like bone marrow tests.
  • They checked if any kids had problems like low oxygen levels or needed extra help breathing during the process.
  • The results showed that there were no serious issues and only a few minor problems, which suggests that it can be done safely by trained Physician Assistants.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!