Comparison of recharge from drywells and infiltration basins: A modeling study.

J Hydrol (Amst)

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, San Francisco, CA 94105, USA.

Published: March 2021

AI Article Synopsis

  • Drywells (DWs) and infiltration basins (IBs) are used for managing stormwater and recharging groundwater, but no prior research has directly compared their performance under the same conditions.
  • A numerical study utilizing HYDRUS software revealed that a larger IB area increases infiltration and accelerates recharge, although DWs ultimately excel in recharge volume after extended simulation periods.
  • Findings suggest that DWs can outperform IBs in terms of efficiency and practicality, particularly in dealing with low permeable layers, making them a potentially superior choice for groundwater recharge with advantages like lower maintenance and contamination concerns.

Article Abstract

Drywells (DWs) and infiltration basins (IBs) are widely used as managed aquifer recharge (MAR) devices to capture stormwater runoff and recharge groundwater. However, no published research has compared the performance of these two engineered systems under shared conditions. Numerical experiments were conducted on an idealized 2D-axisymmetric domain using the HYDRUS (2D/3D) software to systematically study the performance of a circular IB design (diameter and area) and partially penetrating DW (38 m length with water table > 60 m). The effects of subsurface heterogeneity on infiltration, recharge, and storage from the DW and IB under constant head conditions were investigated. The mean cumulative infiltration (μI) and recharge (μR) volumes increased, and the arrival time of recharge decreased with the IB area. Values of μI were higher for a 70 m diameter IB than an DW, whereas the value of μR was higher for a DW after 1-year of a constant head simulation under selected subsurface heterogeneity conditions. A comparison between mean μI, μR, and mean vadose zone storage (μS) values for all DW and IB stochastic simulations (70 for each MAR scenario) under steady-state conditions demonstrated that five DWs can replace a 70 m diameter IB to achieve significantly higher infiltration and recharge over 20 years of operation. Additional numerical experiments were conducted to study the influence of a shallow clay layer by considering an IB, DW, and a DW integrated into an IB. The presence of such a low permeable layer delayed groundwater recharge from an IB. In contrast, a DW can penetrate tight clay layers and release water below them and facilitate rapid infiltration and recharge. The potential benefits of a DW compared to an IB include a smaller footprint, the potential for pre-treatments to remove contaminants, less evaporation, less mobilization of in-situ contaminants, and potentially lower maintenance costs. Besides, this study demonstrates that combining both IB and DW helps to get the best out of both MAR techniques.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8525426PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125720DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

infiltration recharge
12
infiltration basins
8
recharge
8
numerical experiments
8
experiments conducted
8
subsurface heterogeneity
8
constant head
8
infiltration
6
comparison recharge
4
recharge drywells
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!