Conventional Laparoscopy Is the Better Option for Tubal Sterilization Reversal: A Closer Look at Tubal Reanastomosis.

Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle)

Program in Reproductive Endocrinology and Gynecology, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.

Published: September 2021

Permanent sterilization is one of the most common methods of birth control in the United States and around the world. A small subset of women will regret their decision and desire future fertility. For these women, the options include fertilization (IVF) or surgical reversal. Surgical reversal, specifically tubal reanastamosis, is an important choice to consider. Surgical reversal can be accomplished three different general approaches including laparotomy, conventional laparoscopy, and robot-assisted approaches. Unfortunately, surgical reversal is becoming a lost art. To compare and contrast pregnancy success rates, ectopic pregnancy rates, and cost between the surgical methods and IVF. We conducted a literature review via Pubmed with keywords as listed below. Laparoscopic tubal reanastomosis is the best approach for women <40 years of age due to pregnancy outcomes that are comparable to other methods, cost effectiveness, and favorable safety profile of minimally invasive surgery.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8524733PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/whr.2021.0039DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

surgical reversal
16
conventional laparoscopy
8
tubal reanastomosis
8
reversal
5
surgical
5
laparoscopy better
4
better option
4
tubal
4
option tubal
4
tubal sterilization
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!