Background: Penicillin allergy prevalence is internationally reported to be around 10%. However, the majority of patients who report a penicillin allergy do not have a clinically significant hypersensitivity. Few patients undergo evaluation, which leads to overuse of broad-spectrum antibiotics. The objective of this study was to monitor prevalence and implement screening and testing of hospitalized patients.

Methods: All patients admitted to the medical department in a local hospital in Oslo, Norway, with a self-reported penicillin allergy were screened using an interview algorithm to categorize the reported allergy as high-risk or low-risk. Patients with a history of low-risk allergy underwent a direct graded oral amoxicillin challenge to verify absence of a true IgE-type allergy.

Results: 257 of 5529 inpatients (4.6%) reported a penicillin allergy. 191 (74%) of these patients underwent screening, of which 86 (45%) had an allergy categorized as low-risk. 54 (63%) of the low-risk patients consented to an oral test. 98% of these did not have an immediate reaction to the amoxicillin challenge, and their penicillin allergy label could thus be removed. 42% of the patients under treatment with antibiotics during inclusion could switch to treatment with penicillins immediately after testing, in line with the national recommendations for antibiotic use.

Conclusions: The prevalence of self-reported penicillin allergy was lower in this Norwegian population, than reported in other studies. Screening and testing of hospitalized patients with self-reported penicillin allergy is a feasible and easy measure to de-label a large proportion of patients, resulting in immediate clinical and environmental benefit. Our findings suggest that non-allergist physicians can safely undertake clinically impactful allergy evaluations.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8527685PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-021-06794-1DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

penicillin allergy
32
allergy
12
self-reported penicillin
12
patients
10
hospitalized patients
8
screening testing
8
testing hospitalized
8
low-risk patients
8
amoxicillin challenge
8
penicillin
7

Similar Publications

Obstetric penicillin allergy evaluations.

J Allergy Clin Immunol Glob

February 2025

Division of Allergy, Immunology, Rheumatology, Rochester Regional Health.

Background: Penicillin allergy is reported in 5% to 15% of the world population, with 3% to 10% of pregnant women reporting the same. However, more than 90% of these patients can tolerate penicillin after appropriate evaluation. Penicillin is indicated for various issues that arise in pregnancy, and a history of allergy can have negative individual and public health consequences.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Penicillin is a frequently reported medication allergy. The beta-lactam ring shared between cephalosporins and penicillin often leads to the use of alternative antibiotics for surgical prophylaxis due to concern for cross-reactivity, despite a true IgE-mediated hypersensitivity being very rare. This misconception leads to the use of less effective second line antibiotics, such as clindamycin or vancomycin, for penicillin-allergic patients which has been shown to increase odds of postoperative infection in elective knee arthroplasty, shoulder arthroplasty and spine surgery.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Impact of parent-reported antibiotic allergies on paediatric Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs.

J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract

January 2025

Immunology Department, Perth Children's Hospital, Perth, Western Australia; Medical School, University of Western Australia, Australia; Immunology Department, PathWest Laboratory Medicine WA, Perth, Australia; Immunology Department, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Australia. Electronic address:

Background: Antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) is crucial for optimising antimicrobial use and restraining emergence of antimicrobial resistance. The overall increase in reported antibiotic allergies in children can pose a significant barrier to AMS, but its impact on clinical AMS care in children has not been addressed.

Objective: Compare the clinical outcomes for children with a reported antibiotic allergy label (AAL) with those with no AAL reviewed by AMS.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The use of perioperative cephalosporin prophylaxis in patients who have a pre-existing penicillin allergy.

Surgery

January 2025

Department of Internal Medicine, Tampere University Hospital, Wellbeing Services County of Pirkanmaa and Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere, Finland; Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.

Background: Studies have shown an association between a reported penicillin allergy and an increased risk of surgical site infection. The risk is due to avoidance of cephalosporins and to the use of alternative classes of antibiotics in surgical prophylaxis. The aim of this study was to examine the safety of using cephalosporins in patients with a penicillin allergy label.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

How can we remove erroneous penicillin allergy labels?

Evid Based Dent

January 2025

Public Health Directorate, NHS Lanarkshire, Kirklands, Fallside Road, Bothwell, G71 8BB, UK.

Objectives: To evaluate the use of the Penicillin Allergy Reassessment for Treatment Improvement (PARTI) tool in supporting appropriate penicillin allergy labelling in dental practices.

Design: Parallel mixed methods study.

Methods: Focus groups of patients with documented penicillin allergies and healthcare worker targeted questionnaires were used in gathering feedback on the PARTI tool's design and functionality.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!