Background:  Loss of elbow flexion is a common sequela of acute brachial plexus injuries (BPIs). The Mackinnon/Oberlin-II double fascicular transfer (DFT) is a widely used method to restore this function in acute C5-6 or C5-7 injuries. This study attempted to evaluate if this technique can be applied reliably for cases involving C8 and/or T1 injuries.

Methods:  Adult patients with acute BPIs who underwent the Mackinnon/Oberlin-II DFT in our center between 2008 and 2018 were retrospectively identified. Group I ( = 37) included patients with only C5-6 or C5-7 injury, while group II ( = 32) patients presented C5-8 ± T1 injuries. The demographic data, pre- and postoperative neurologic evaluations, electrodiagnostic studies, and grip strength assessment were collected.

Results:  A total of 69 patients met the inclusion criteria. Preoperatively, the patients in group II presented poorer nerve conduction and electromyography in both the median and the ulnar nerves and the supply muscles. The percentage of M3 achievement in both groups was 91.9 versus 87.5% and M4 was 73.0 and 71.9%, respectively, which both were not statically significant but the achievement of group II was slower than the group I, 1 to 2 months slower, respectively. Both groups had 57.57 and 46.0% of the postoperative grip power compared with the healthy side, the result of shoulder abduction was not different ( = 0.480).

Conclusion:  With careful preoperative evaluation, early intervention, appropriate intraoperative functional fascicle selection, and aggressive postoperative rehabilitation, indications for the Mackinnon/Oberlin-II DFT technique can safely include acute C5-8 injuries and even partial T1 acute BPIs.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1736320DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

double fascicular
8
fascicular transfer
8
elbow flexion
8
acute brachial
8
brachial plexus
8
c5-6 c5-7
8
acute bpis
8
mackinnon/oberlin-ii dft
8
acute
6
patients
5

Similar Publications

Purpose: The surgical management of adult traumatic brachial plexus injuries (BPI) is challenging, with no consensus on optimal strategies. This study aimed to gather preferred reconstructive strategies from BPI surgeons for actual cases from a multicenter cohort to identify areas of agreement.

Methods: Four case files (history, physical examination, and imaging and electrodiagnostic testing results) were distributed to eight self-designated Level IV expert BPI surgeons in the United States.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • * Results showed that, although there was no significant difference in recovery levels for different injury severities, the double fascicular transfer group had a better average Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand score.
  • * Meta-regression indicated that double fascicular transfer was a significant predictor for achieving higher MRC grades (3 and 4), while overall donor site complications were similar between both methods.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: The Oberlin II double fascicular nerve transfer has been evaluated extensively for objective outcomes for elbow flexion in brachial plexus injuries (BPI). However, there is limited information available on the recovery pattern of supination and patient-reported activity in the long-term. Our study aimed to assess the functional results with a minimum of five years of follow-up.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Double fascicular nerve transfer (DFT) is often performed to re-animate the elbow flexors. Studies of motor recovery following this surgery have exclusively reported on the objective outcome of muscle power. Questionnaire studies allow researchers and clinicians to learn from patients and better direct care towards their needs.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!