A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Multicenter evaluation of the FilmArray Meningitis/Encephalitis assay in a routine setting. | LitMetric

Multicenter evaluation of the FilmArray Meningitis/Encephalitis assay in a routine setting.

J Med Microbiol

Clinical Biology, Laboratory for Molecular Diagnostics, Jessa Hospital, Salvatorstraat 20, 3500 Hasselt, Belgium.

Published: October 2021

The FilmArray Meningitis/Encephalitis (FA-ME) Panel (Biofire, Salt Lake City, Utah, US) enables fast and automated detection of 14 pathogens in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). The performance of the FA-ME panel in a real routine setting has not yet been described and could lead to better patient management in cases of good performance. This multicenter study verified the FA-ME panel analytical performance in a routine hospital setting. Between April 2016 and April 2018, 454 CSF samples were analysed with the FA-ME panel and compared with routine diagnostics. In cases of discrepancy or lack of a comparator result, a profound analysis based on patient records and other laboratory results was performed. A first analysis of 65 frozen samples, suspicious for meningitis had a 89 % concordance with routine diagnostics. The limit of detection (LOD) was confirmed for all pathogens except for and a strain of and LOD experiments were not performed). The routine evaluation showed a positive result in 114 (25 %) clinical samples for at least one target. In three samples co-infections were found. After discrepancy analysis, overall sensitivity was 98 % (false negative FA-ME results for one HSV2, two HSV1 and two parechovirus). Four FA-ME results were considered false positive (two HHV6, one VZV and one ), resulting in an overall specificity of >99 %. A clinical added value of the assay was seen in the diagnosis of eight cases of bacterial meningitis. Because of its rapidity and ease of use, the FA-ME panel has great potential in the diagnosis of central nervous infections. Implementation can improve clinical management, but costs and analytical limitations need to be addressed to convince clinicians and laboratories of its value.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.001438DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

fa-me panel
20
filmarray meningitis/encephalitis
8
routine setting
8
routine diagnostics
8
fa-me
7
routine
6
panel
5
multicenter evaluation
4
evaluation filmarray
4
meningitis/encephalitis assay
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!