AI Article Synopsis

  • Re-operative mitral valve surgery poses higher technical challenges and complications compared to primary surgeries, but minimally invasive techniques may lower these risks.
  • A study involving 65 patients undergoing this type of surgical intervention revealed a mix of procedures, with most patients receiving valve replacements, and overall, no deaths occurred during hospital stays.
  • Complications included renal failure and the need for surgical reoperation due to bleeding, and patients in the redo surgery group experienced significantly longer cardiopulmonary bypass times compared to those undergoing elective surgeries.

Article Abstract

Background: Re-operative mitral valve surgery is sometimes burdened by a greater technical difficulty and a higher complications rate than the first operation. Minimally invasive cardiac surgery has become routine, and it could significantly reduce the surgical risk in redo surgery. The objective of our retrospective observational study is to assess the results of cardiac reoperations in patients with mitral valve disease approached trough a 5-7 cm right mini-thoracotomy.

Methods: From February 2017 to December 2019, 65 patients underwent re-operative mitral valve surgery in our institution. Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) was started by cannulation of the femoral and jugular vein and femoral artery or alternatively right axillary artery. Patients enrolled had a mean age of 66.6±11.5 years. Patients were divided into three groups based on the procedure adopted: external aortic cross-clamp (EAC), EndoAortic balloon occlusion (EABO) and ventricular fibrillation (VF). Major complications were evaluated and compared with a propensity matched population of patients undergoing elective isolated mitral valve surgery via right minithoracotomy (MVS).

Results: The average time between last operation and reoperation was 7.1±3.4 years. Fourteen patients (21%) underwent mitral valve repair and 51 patients (78%) underwent mitral valve replacement; 9 patients (14%) received tricuspid valve surgery. There was no statistically significant difference in CPB time between the groups. Seven patients (11%) had a postoperative renal failure, 5 patients (8%) underwent surgical reopening for bleeding; incidence of post-operative stroke and pace-maker implantation was 3% for both. No deaths were registered during in-hospital stay and at 30-days echocardiographic control all patients respect the criterions of device success according with MVARC. Propensity matched patients of group redo had a longer CPB time (100.8±42.7 versus 72.8±16.7 min, P<0.001) and cross-clamp time (71.9±30.7 versus 59±10.7 min, P<0.001) respect to first operation mitral valve surgery patients.

Conclusions: Minimally invasive mitral valve redo surgery is a safe procedure. Less invasive techniques in redo surgery could minimize morbidity and mortality without prolonging the duration of CPB.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8482333PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-21-667DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

mitral valve
28
valve surgery
20
patients
12
valve
8
re-operative mitral
8
patients underwent
8
propensity matched
8
underwent mitral
8
cpb time
8
mitral
7

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!