A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Effect of intra-abdominal administration of ascites fluid on postoperative peritoneal adhesion in rat model: A randomized controlled trail. | LitMetric

Introduction: Intra-abdominal adhesions are typically found after the most surgical procedures. Normally, most adhesions are asymptomatic; however, few individuals experience postoperative adhesion-related problems such as small bowel obstruction, pelvic pain, infertility, or other complications. We aimed to evaluate the preventive effect of the ascites fluid for postoperative peritoneal adhesions in rat models.

Material And Methods: This experimental trial was conducted in Sixty Syrian male rat randomly assigned to six groups of 10 animals each as follows: control (group 1&4); normal saline (group 2&5): 2 mL of normal saline was poured into the peritoneal cavity; and case (group 3&6): 2 mL ascites fluid was poured into the peritoneal cavity. All animals in the six groups underwent laparotomy and measurable serosal injury were created with a standard technique. 10 and 30 days after initial surgery, the rats underwent another laparotomy in groups 1, 2, 3 and 4, 5, 6, respectively to assess macroscopic and microscopic adhesions, which were scored by an examiner who was blind to the animals̕ group assignment. Data analyzed by SPSS version 18, using the kruskal Wallis and Bonferroni-corrected Mann-Whitney U tests. P-values of less than 0.05 were considered significant.

Results: The mean scores of both microscopic and macroscopic adhesion were significantly different between all the groups (P < 0.05). Total macroscopic and microscopic adhesion scores were significantly lower in the ascites fluid treatment than in the control (P = 0.0001) or the normal saline (P < 0.001) group. There was no significant difference between adhesion intensity 10 and 30 days after laparotomy (P > 0.05).

Conclusions: Ascites fluid can decrease the possibility of post-operative intraperitoneal adhesion formation.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8503846PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102928DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

ascites fluid
12
fluid postoperative
8
postoperative peritoneal
8
normal saline
8
poured peritoneal
8
peritoneal cavity
8
underwent laparotomy
8
intra-abdominal administration
4
administration ascites
4
peritoneal
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!