The plume-chasing method has shown great advantages in measuring on-road emission factors (EFs) compared with regulatory methods like dynamometer and portable emission measurement systems (PEMS). In this study, a new on-board measurement system incorporating ultrasonic anemometers and solid-state Lidar was developed to investigate the uncertainties of on-road emission factors measured by plume-chasing method due to variables such as on-road wind velocity, chasing speed, chasing distance, and turbulent kinetic energy (TKE). A series of PEMS-chasing experiments for heavy-duty diesel vehicles (HDDVs) were conducted on both highways and local roadways in Beijing, China. Our analysis demonstrated that the differences in EF estimations between concurrent plume-chasing and PEMS measurement decreased with increasing chasing speed as a result of greater vehicle-induced TKE in the wake between HDDV and the mobile platform, whereas the effect of chasing distance on EF estimations appeared insignificant within the tested distance range (12-22 m). In the case of strong crosswinds, overprediction of chasing-based EFs was observed due to convective plume mixing from surrounding vehicular sources. The findings of this study contribute greatly to interpret emission factors measured by the plume-chasing method, and also calls for a future study to develop real-time EF correction algorithms for large-scale mobile chasing measurements.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.127372 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!