An Exploratory, Qualitative Study of How Organizations Implement the Hierarchy of Controls Applied to .

Int J Environ Res Public Health

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention, 8 Corporate Blvd. NE, Atlanta, GA 30329, USA.

Published: September 2021

AI Article Synopsis

  • - There is a lack of understanding on how Total Worker Health (TWH) guidelines are applied in U.S. organizations, prompting a study to explore real-world applications of the Hierarchy of Controls for TWH from 2012-2019.
  • - The research involved 18 organizations recognized for promising TWH practices, using qualitative interviews to gather insights on issues like fatigue, stress, sedentary work, and tobacco control.
  • - Key findings revealed four main themes: awareness of TWH and its framework, practical implementation challenges, barriers and supports in addressing workplace issues, and how organizational culture affects successful integration of health and safety initiatives.

Article Abstract

Understanding of how (TWH) guidelines are implemented in employment organizations in the USA is not well understood. The purpose of this study is to explore how the principles of the Hierarchy of Controls Applied to NIOSH Total Worker Health (TWH HoC), have been implemented among organizations featured as Promising Practices for TWH between 2012-2019, with special focus on the work-related issues of fatigue, stress, sedentary work, and tobacco control. We also sought to identify benefits, obstacles, and lessons learned in the implementation of the TWH HoC. Eighteen organizations were identified to be included in the study. Using a qualitative cross-sectional design and purposive sampling, seven in-depth interviews were conducted with thirteen key informants. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research was used to guide the thematic analysis and interpretation of qualitative data. Four themes identified include recognition of the TWH approach and TWH HoC, implementation of the TWH HoC, barriers and facilitators in addressing specific work-related issues, and implementation climate primes benefits, obstacles, and lessons learned. The inner setting (i.e., culture, implementation climate, readiness for implementation) of organizations was a prominent determinant of the implementation of integrated worker safety, health, and well-being interventions.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8508424PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph181910032DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

twh hoc
16
hierarchy controls
8
controls applied
8
work-related issues
8
benefits obstacles
8
obstacles lessons
8
lessons learned
8
implementation twh
8
implementation climate
8
twh
7

Similar Publications

Background: Psychosocial hazards in the workplace contribute to mental disorders, cardiovascular diseases, and musculoskeletal ill-health. The Hierarchy of Controls applied to NIOSH Total Worker Health (TWH HOC) aims to mitigate these hazards through effective interventions. This study proposes a revision of the model resulting in a HOC for psychosocial hazards (P-HOC) and explores its application in improving the working environment.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Aims: Baseline diabetic retinopathy (DR) and risk of development of microalbuminuria, kidney function decline, and cardiovascular events (CVEs) in type 2 diabetes.

Methods: Post-hoc analysis of the PRIORITY study including 1758 persons with type 2 diabetes and normoalbuminuria followed for a median of 2.5 (IQR: 2.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Aims: To investigate to what extent multiple risk marker improvements confer lower risk of cardiovascular and kidney complications in a contemporary type 2 diabetes population.

Materials And Methods: Post-hoc analysis of the LEADER (n = 8638; median follow-up 3.8 years) and SUSTAIN 6 (n = 3040; median follow-up 2.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

An Exploratory, Qualitative Study of How Organizations Implement the Hierarchy of Controls Applied to .

Int J Environ Res Public Health

September 2021

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention, 8 Corporate Blvd. NE, Atlanta, GA 30329, USA.

Article Synopsis
  • - There is a lack of understanding on how Total Worker Health (TWH) guidelines are applied in U.S. organizations, prompting a study to explore real-world applications of the Hierarchy of Controls for TWH from 2012-2019.
  • - The research involved 18 organizations recognized for promising TWH practices, using qualitative interviews to gather insights on issues like fatigue, stress, sedentary work, and tobacco control.
  • - Key findings revealed four main themes: awareness of TWH and its framework, practical implementation challenges, barriers and supports in addressing workplace issues, and how organizational culture affects successful integration of health and safety initiatives.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Randomized trial of preladenant, given as monotherapy, in patients with early Parkinson disease.

Neurology

June 2017

From the Institute of Neurology (F.S.), IRCCS San Raffaele, Rome, Italy; Departments of Clinical Pharmacology and Neurosciences (O.R.), Clinical Investigation Center CIC1436, NS-Park Clinical Research Network, NeuroToul Centre of Excellence in Neurodegeneration, INSERM, Toulouse University Hospital and Toulouse University, France; Parkinson's Disease and Movement Disorders Center (R.A.H.), USF Health-Byrd Institute, Tampa, FL; and Merck & Co., Inc. (S.H., A.T., R.C., T.W.H., P.S., C.L., D.M., D.J.H.), Kenilworth, NJ.

Objective: To evaluate the adenosine 2a receptor antagonist preladenant as a nondopaminergic drug for the treatment of Parkinson disease (PD) when given as monotherapy.

Methods: This was a randomized, 26-week, placebo- and active-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter, double-blind trial conducted in adults diagnosed with PD for <5 years who were not yet receiving l-dopa or dopamine agonists. Patients with a Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) part 3 (motor function) score ≥10 and Hoehn & Yahr score ≤3 were randomized 1:1:1:1:1 to preladenant 2, 5, or 10 mg twice daily, rasagiline 1 mg (active-control) once daily, or placebo.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!