Goals: This paper discusses the need for a predictable method to evaluate gains and gaps of collaborative technology-mediated workflows and introduces an evaluation framework to address this need.

Methods: The Collaborative Space - Analysis Framework (CS-AF), introduced in this research, is a cross-disciplinary evaluation method designed to evaluate technology-mediated collaborative workflows. The 5-step CS-AF meta-process includes: (1) current-state workflow definition, (2) current-state (baseline) workflow assessment, (3) technology-mediated workflow development and deployment, (4) technology-mediated workflow assessment, (5) analysis and conclusions. For this research, a comprehensive, empirical study of hypertension exam workflow for telehealth was conducted using the CS-AF approach.

Results: The CS-AF systemized approach reveals critical cross-disciplinary evaluation data concerning gains and gaps of collaborative workflows when technology-mediated enhancements are characterized and compared with a baseline workflow for the goal of continuous workflow improvement.

Conclusion: The CS-AF is an effective meta-analysis process that can be adapted for use in multiple domains.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/JBHI.2021.3119458DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

collaborative workflows
12
technology-mediated collaborative
8
gains gaps
8
gaps collaborative
8
cross-disciplinary evaluation
8
baseline workflow
8
workflow assessment
8
technology-mediated workflow
8
workflow
7
collaborative
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!