Dr. R. Lee Clark Jr. was a man of bold and extraordinary vision. He was truly a surgical oncology leader of the twentieth century. His leadership had a significant impact on the cancer community nationally and internationally. Historically, it is intriguing that Dr. Clark almost did not become President of the UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, since five other candidates were first offered the position and turned it down, and then Clark himself almost withdrew during the search process because of the political stalemate among the UT Regents to select a candidate. The saga began in 1945, when the Acting Director of MD Anderson Hospital for Cancer Research, Dr. Ernst Bertner, pressed the UT Regents to recruit a permanent Director, since he had just been appointed as the first President of the Texas Medical Center. Bertner was a major figure in recruiting Dr. R. Lee Clark, who was then a Lt. Colonel in the Army Air Force. Dr. Clark's vision for this unique cancer facility was first drafted on Randolph Army Airfield stationary in February 1946. An interesting twist to the story is that Dr. Clark almost did not get the job because of an alternative candidate, and because of the political vicissitudes among the University of Texas Board of Regents. Many of these political barriers were eventually overcome, and Dr. Clark was unanimously approved as the first permanent Director on 13 July 1946, and his leadership over the next 32 years changed the course of history.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-021-10736-1 | DOI Listing |
Mood and anxiety disorders involve defining symptoms (e.g., dysphoria, anhedonia) that can impair psychosocial functioning (e.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFHealth Secur
September 2024
Eric C. Deussing, MD, MPH, FACPM, Capt MC USN (Ret.), is a Senior Advisor for Public Health and Former Director, Department of of Defense (DOD) National Disaster Medical System Pilot Program; Clemia Anderson III, MPH, Capt MSC USN, is Director, DOD National Disaster Medical System Pilot Program; Jeffrey D. Freeman, PhD, MPH, is Director; and Thomas D. Kirsch, MD, MPH, is Director Emeritus; all at the National Center for Disaster Medicine and Public Health, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD. Emily R. Post, PhD, is a Research Scientist; Clark J. Lee, JD, MPH, is a Senior Research Associate; Adeteju A. Adeniji, MPH, is a Research Coordinator; Allyson R. Sison, MA, is Stakeholder Engagement Manager; Michelle M. Kimball, MS, LTC USAR, is Director, Operations Mission; and Alison Ng, MS, is a Program Evaluator; all at the Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Inc., Bethesda, MD, supporting the National Center for Disaster Medicine and Public Health, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD.
Personal Disord
September 2024
Department of Psychiatry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center.
We aimed to determine and compare the longitudinal predictive power of ) two models of personality disorder (PD) for multiple clinically relevant outcomes. A sample of 600 community-dwelling adults-half recruited by calling randomly selected phone numbers and screening-in for high-risk for personality pathology and half in treatment for mental health problems-completed an extensive battery of self-report and interview measures of personality pathology, clinical symptoms, and psychosocial functioning. Of these, 503 returned for retesting on the same measures an average of 8 months later.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFThe (; American Psychiatric Association, 2013), includes 10 categorical personality disorders (PD) in Section II (Section II PD) and a dimensional alternative model of PD (AMPD) in Section III. We compared the two models in explaining concurrent psychosocial functioning levels in psychiatric outpatients and community residents screened as at risk for PD pathology ( = 600). The AMPD's fully dimensional form showed stronger associations with psychosocial difficulties and explained more of their variance compared with the categorical Section II PD.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFIndian J Psychol Med
May 2024
Dept. of Psychology, University of Notre Dame, USA.
Background: There is little and heterogeneous knowledge on the links between the temperamental predispositions of psychopathology and the contemporary dimensional models of psychopathology, such as the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP) classification system, which can be aligned with the five-factor model (FFM) of personality. This meta-analysis seeks to expand the temperamental theoretical basis of the HiTOP model by incorporating associations of temperament traits of two temperamental theories measured, respectively, by the Temperament and Character Inventory (TCI) and the Temperament Evaluation of Memphis, Pisa, Paris, and San Diego Autoquestionnaire (TEMPS-A) with (a) the FFM's personality domains and (b) HiTOP's five psychopathological spectra.
Methods: A systematic search was done on Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, ProQuest, Cochrane Database, and Google Scholar for all articles published in English from January 1990 to August 2020.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!