The Validity of the Holtzman Inkblot Technique: New Indices.

Front Psychol

Department of Dynamic and Clinical Psychology, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.

Published: September 2021

The present study examines the validity of 11 new Holtzman Inkblot Technique indices. These were chosen from Exner's Comprehensive System (RCS) indices using two criteria: first, they had to be valid according to meta-analysis, and second, they must be computed using the HIT standard scoring system. Both techniques were administrated with a retest interval from 1 to 7days to a sample of 139 subjects (63 males and 76 females) from the general population. The validity of the new indices was studied through Pearson correlation () with the corresponding RCS indices. Nine of the 11 new indices (R-HIT, F%-HIT, M-HIT, m-HIT, C'-HIT, Blends-HIT, PureH-HIT, DQ+HIT, and X-%-HIT) showed significant correlations with Rorschach scales, confirming our hypotheses. The correlation ranged from a minimum of 0.144 to a maximum of 0.414. The results provide support for the validity of the new HIT indices and have important implications for both clinical and research fields.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8492909PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.621669DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

validity holtzman
8
holtzman inkblot
8
inkblot technique
8
technique indices
8
rcs indices
8
indices
7
validity
4
indices study
4
study examines
4
examines validity
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!