This study establishes the relationship between a manager's Machiavellian personality and unethical behavior. It also tests the cross-level interaction effects of collectivism and power distance on the relationship between a Machiavellian personality and unethical behavior. The multi-level and multi-source data are collected from 22 public sector organizations from which 202 responses from managers about their personalities, power distance, and collectivism, and 626 subordinates' ratings of the managers' unethical behavior were received and used. The results show that Machiavellian personality has a positive relationship with unethical behavior. The cross-level interaction effects also show that cultural dimensions such as power distance, and collectivism-significantly and positively moderate the relationship between Machiavellian personality and unethical behavior. Based on the study's findings, implications for theory and practice are offered.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/SJP.2021.43 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Ethics Committees' Practices in Healthcare, Banking and Research: Key Requirements for Their Functionality.
J Eval Clin Pract
February 2025
Institute of the History of Medicine and Ethics in Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Rationale: To meet concerns about ethical and unethical behavior in their work environments and workplaces, organizations began establishing ethics programs that contain ethics committees (ECs). There is now a tradition and diverse use of ECs for ethical decision-making in many different organizational settings. In addition, ECs have been subject to many publications in books and articles in the scientific literature.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFNudging in the nursing home: A qualitative interpretive study.
Int J Nurs Stud Adv
June 2025
Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Nursing and Health Promotion, OsloMet-Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.
Background: Nudging involves deliberately changing the environment or context to induce better choices. Several studies consider such methods unethical manipulation that threatens the principles of informed consent and autonomy, which are particularly vital in healthcare. Others argue that nudging respects personal freedom because it is not in conflict with the person's explicit values or choices, beneficial, and easy to resist.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAbortion and contraception within prison health care: a qualitative study.
BMC Womens Health
January 2025
University of British Columbia Faculty of Medicine, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Background: Although abortion was completely decriminalized in Canada 36 years ago, barriers to pregnancy prevention and termination persist across the country, such as travel and information gaps. Research demonstrates incarcerated people face barriers to family planning care, yet there is no systematic data collection of sexual and reproductive health experiences and outcomes among incarcerated people in Canada. The aim of this study was to explore family planning care experiences among women and gender diverse people who have experienced incarceration in Canada.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFA novel framework for assessing causal effect of microbiome on health: long-term antibiotic usage as an instrument.
Gut Microbes
December 2025
Estonian Genome Center, Institute of Genomics, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.
Assessing causality is undoubtedly one of the key questions in microbiome studies for the upcoming years. Since randomized trials in human subjects are often unethical or difficult to pursue, analytical methods to derive causal effects from observational data deserve attention. As simple covariate adjustment is not likely to account for all potential confounders, the idea of instrumental variable (IV) analysis is worth exploiting.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCheat, cheat, repeat: On the consistency of dishonest behavior in structurally comparable situations.
J Pers Soc Psychol
January 2025
Department of Psychology, University of Marburg.
A fundamental assumption about human behavior forming the backbone of trait theories is that, to some extent, individuals behave consistently across structurally comparable situations. However, especially for unethical behavior, the consistency assumption has been severely questioned, at least from the early 19th century onward. We provide a strict test of the consistency assumption for a prominent instance of unethical behavior-dishonesty-in a large ( = 1,916) and demographically diverse sample.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWant AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!