The risks of using unapproved gene symbols.

Am J Hum Genet

HUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton CB10 1SD, UK; Department of Haematology, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Cambridge CB2 0PT, UK. Electronic address:

Published: October 2021

The use of approved nomenclature in publications is vital to enable effective scientific communication and is particularly crucial when discussing genes of clinical relevance. Here, we discuss several examples of cases where the failure of researchers to use a HUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee (HGNC)-approved symbol in publications has led to confusion between unrelated human genes in the literature. We also inform authors of the steps they can take to ensure that they use approved nomenclature in their manuscripts and discuss how referencing HGNC IDs can remove ambiguity when referring to genes that have previously been published with confusing alias symbols.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8546045PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2021.09.004DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

approved nomenclature
8
risks unapproved
4
unapproved gene
4
gene symbols
4
symbols approved
4
nomenclature publications
4
publications vital
4
vital enable
4
enable effective
4
effective scientific
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!