A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Highly Porous 3D Printed Tantalum Scaffolds Have Better Biomechanical and Microstructural Properties than Titanium Scaffolds. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to evaluate how 3D printed tantalum and titanium scaffolds behave mechanically.
  • Different types of porous scaffolds were produced and analyzed using various tests, revealing tantalum's superior stress performance but lower stiffness compared to titanium.
  • Overall, tantalum scaffolds with different pore sizes exhibited biomechanical properties more akin to real bone compared to titanium scaffolds.

Article Abstract

Objective: To test the biomechanical properties of 3D printed tantalum and titanium porous scaffolds.

Methods: Four types of tantalum and titanium scaffolds with four alternative pore diameters, #1 (1000-700 m), #2 (700-1000 m), #3 (500-800 m), and #4 (800-500 m), were molded by selective laser melting technique, and the scaffolds were tested by scanning electronic microscope, uniaxial-compression tests, and Young's modulus tests; they were compared with same size pig femoral bone scaffolds.

Results: Under uniaxial-compression tests, equivalent stress of tantalum scaffold was 411 ± 1.43 MPa, which was significantly larger than the titanium scaffolds ( < 0.05). Young's modulus of tantalum scaffold was 2.61 ± 0.02 GPa, which was only half of that of titanium scaffold. The stress-strain curves of tantalum scaffolds were more similar to pig bone scaffolds than titanium scaffolds.

Conclusion: 3D printed tantalum scaffolds with varying pore diameters are more similar to actual bone scaffolds compared with titanium scaffolds in biomechanical properties.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8492259PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/2899043DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

titanium scaffolds
16
printed tantalum
12
tantalum scaffolds
12
scaffolds
10
biomechanical properties
8
tantalum titanium
8
pore diameters
8
uniaxial-compression tests
8
young's modulus
8
tantalum scaffold
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!