Many models of psychopathology include a single general factor of psychopathology (GFP) or " factor" to account for covariation across symptoms. The Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study provides a rich opportunity to study the development of the GFP. However, a variety of approaches for modeling the GFP have emerged, raising questions about how modeling choices impact estimated GFP scores. We used the ABCD baseline assessment (ages 9-10 years-old; =11,875) of the parent-rated Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) to examine the implications of modeling the GFP using items versus scales; using a priori CBCL scales versus data-driven dimensions; and using bifactor, higher-order, or single-factor models. Children's rank-ordering on the GFP was stable across models, with GFP scores similarly related to criterion variables. Results suggest that while theoretical debates about modeling the GFP continue, the practical implications of these choices for rank-ordering children and assessing external associations will often be modest.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8494184PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2167702620959317DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

modeling gfp
12
general factor
8
factor psychopathology
8
adolescent brain
8
brain cognitive
8
cognitive development
8
development abcd
8
abcd study
8
gfp
8
gfp scores
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!