AI Article Synopsis

Article Abstract

Results: In 100 patients (mean age 67.1, 65% male), no significant differences were observed in ACT values obtained from the guiding catheter and arterial sheath (mean difference (MD) -18.3 s; standard deviation (SD) 96 s; =0.067). Contrarily, ACT values obtained from the intravenous line were significantly lower as compared to values obtained from the guiding catheter (MD 25.7 s; SD 75.5; =0.003) and arterial sheath (MD 39 s; SD 102.8; < 0.001). Furthermore, ACT measurements from the arterial sheath showed a statistically significant proportional bias when compared to the other sampling sites (sheath vs. catheter,  = 0.761, =0.001; sheath vs. IVL,  = 1.013, < 0.001).

Conclusions: The present study shows statistical significance and possibly clinically relevant variations between ACT measurements from different sample sites. Bias in ACT measurements may be minimized by using uniform protocols for ACT measurement during cardiac catheterization.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8452433PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/4091289DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

arterial sheath
12
cardiac catheterization
8
values guiding
8
guiding catheter
8
sheath
5
measuring activated
4
activated clotting
4
clotting time
4
time cardiac
4
catheterization pci
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!