Reward prediction error in the ERP following unconditioned aversive stimuli.

Sci Rep

School of Psychology, University of East Anglia, Norwich Business Park, NR4 7TJ, UK.

Published: October 2021

Reinforcement learning in humans and other animals is driven by reward prediction errors: deviations between the amount of reward or punishment initially expected and that which is obtained. Temporal difference methods of reinforcement learning generate this reward prediction error at the earliest time at which a revision in reward or punishment likelihood is signalled, for example by a conditioned stimulus. Midbrain dopamine neurons, believed to compute reward prediction errors, generate this signal in response to both conditioned and unconditioned stimuli, as predicted by temporal difference learning. Electroencephalographic recordings of human participants have suggested that a component named the feedback-related negativity (FRN) is generated when this signal is carried to the cortex. If this is so, the FRN should be expected to respond equivalently to conditioned and unconditioned stimuli. However, very few studies have attempted to measure the FRN's response to unconditioned stimuli. The present study attempted to elicit the FRN in response to a primary aversive stimulus (electric shock) using a design that varied reward prediction error while holding physical intensity constant. The FRN was strongly elicited, but earlier and more transiently than typically seen, suggesting that it may incorporate other processes than the midbrain dopamine system.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8497484PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-99408-4DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

reward prediction
20
prediction error
12
unconditioned stimuli
12
reinforcement learning
8
prediction errors
8
reward punishment
8
temporal difference
8
midbrain dopamine
8
conditioned unconditioned
8
reward
7

Similar Publications

Bipolar disorder (BD) involves altered reward processing and decision-making, with inconsistencies across studies. Here, we integrated hierarchical Bayesian modelling with magnetoencephalography (MEG) to characterise maladaptive belief updating in this condition. First, we determined if previously reported increased learning rates in BD stem from a heightened expectation of environmental changes.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Explainable post hoc portfolio management financial policy of a Deep Reinforcement Learning agent.

PLoS One

January 2025

Faculty of Economics and Business (ICADE), Universidad Pontificia Comillas, Madrid, Spain.

Financial portfolio management investment policies computed quantitatively by modern portfolio theory techniques like the Markowitz model rely on a set of assumptions that are not supported by data in high volatility markets such as the technological sector or cryptocurrencies. Hence, quantitative researchers are looking for alternative models to tackle this problem. Concretely, portfolio management (PM) is a problem that has been successfully addressed recently by Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) approaches.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Risk preference changes nonlinearly across development. Although extensive developmental research on the neurotypical (NTP) population has shown that risk preference is highest during adolescence, developmental changes in risk preference in autistic (AUT) people, who tend to prefer predictable behaviors, have not been investigated. Here, we aimed to investigate these changes and underlying computational mechanisms.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Fear of missing out (FoMO) is the apprehension that others may be having more rewarding experiences from which one is absent. A positive relationship between FoMO and social media related behaviors is well established. Limited studies have examined how FoMO may be associated with risky health behaviors, such as alcohol use.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Women tend to negotiate less than men, which-along with other well-documented interpersonal and structural factors-contributes to persistent gender gaps in pay for equal work. Here, we explore the developmental origins of these gender differences in negotiation. Across three studies ( = 462), we investigated 6- to 12-year-old girls' and boys' perceptions of negotiation (e.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!