Objective: Although higher quality patient-therapist alliance and more positive patient outcome expectation (OE) consistently predict symptomatic/functional improvement in psychotherapy, most research has failed to capture the nuance in these process-outcome relations by parsing them into (i.e., differences between patients treated by the same therapist) and (i.e., differences between therapists' average process/outcome ratings across all patients in their caseloads) components. Moreover, the few studies that have done so have produced mixed results, suggesting the possibility of systematic variability in these associations (i.e., moderators). One potential source of such variability could be providers themselves; that is, different therapists could use these processes to differing therapeutic benefit. This study tested the alliance- and OE-outcome associations at both the within- and between-therapist levels and explored therapist-level moderators of them.

Method: Data derived from 212 adult outpatients treated naturalistically by 42 psychotherapists as part of a randomized trial that compared different case-assignment methods. Patients completed measures of alliance, OE, and outcome repeatedly throughout treatment. Therapist characteristics were assessed at baseline.

Results: Multilevel structural equation models revealed that, at the between-therapist level, only higher alliance quality, but not more optimistic OE, was associated with greater caseload-level improvement. At the within-therapist level, only more optimistic OE, but not higher alliance quality, was associated with patient improvement. Finally, therapists' self-perceived alliance-fostering effectiveness and cognitive-behavioral orientation moderated the within- and between-therapist alliance-outcome associations, respectively.

Conclusion: Results indicate that different therapists use common treatment processes to differing therapeutic benefit, which can inform more personalized clinical practices and trainings. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000676DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

within- between-therapist
12
processes differing
8
differing therapeutic
8
therapeutic benefit
8
higher alliance
8
alliance quality
8
therapist-level moderation
4
moderation within-
4
between-therapist
4
between-therapist process-outcome
4

Similar Publications

The predictive power of movement and electrodermal activity (EDA) synchrony has been demonstrated in various studies. Although most studies have examined each synchrony modality separately, a growing interest in the simultaneous investigation of multiple modalities has emerged. Previous research has demonstrated the importance of disentangling within and between-dyad effects, however within and between-therapist effects have yet to be investigated.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Revisiting sources of variability in gait analysis.

Gait Posture

December 2024

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Missouri, 1100 Virginia Ave, Columbia, MO 65211, USA; Department of Physical Therapy, College of Health Sciences, University of Missouri, 703 S 5th Street, Columbia, MO 65211, USA. Electronic address:

Background: Gait analyses in clinical populations must be considered differently, as variation in measurements may be related to the clinical condition and not just factors of interest. However, measurements taken from gait also have natural variability and this variability is further compounded when multiple factors may be of clinical interest.

Research Question: Do current methods properly assign and quantify the amount of variability in gait data?

Methods: Simulated data were utilized to identify subject and therapist effects using multiple gait trials; data were simulated with and without multiple sessions with therapists.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The abandonment of psychotherapeutic treatments is influenced by various factors, including patient characteristics, therapist traits, and the therapeutic relationship. Despite the well-documented importance of these factors, limited empirical research has focused on the role of the therapeutic relationship and the characteristics of therapist-patient dyads in predicting treatment dropout. This study protocol outlines a longitudinal research project aimed at predicting dropout and non-response in psychotherapy for individuals with personality disorders.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The purpose of this study was to: (1) confirm the factor structure of a therapist-report measure of adaptations to an autism evidence-based intervention (EBI), (2) identify predictors of adaptation types, and (3) examine associations of adaptation types with observed therapist fidelity. Participants included a subset of therapists (N = 70; 31.4% Hispanic), autistic children (N = 79; ages 5-13 years; 57.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The impact of depth of elaboration in individual psychotherapy sessions on overall treatment effectiveness was found in the empirical literature. In the best sessions, relevant content is processed with greater depth; in contrast, in the shallower sessions, the emerging content is more superficial. Evidence suggests that achieving a high level of depth is closely related to specific therapist characteristics and relational dimensions (including clinicians' emotional responses to patients).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!