For nasotracheal intubation, which nostril results in less epistaxis: right or left?: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Eur J Anaesthesiol

From the Medical School of Nantong University, Nantong (YLT), Department of Oral Anesthesiology, Nanjing Stomatological Hospital (ZHW, BJZ, YCD) and Central Laboratory, Nanjing Stomatological Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China (YHN).

Published: November 2021

Background: Nasotracheal intubation is usually required in patients undergoing oromaxillofacial, otolaryngological or plastic surgery to prevent the airway encroaching into the operating field. Epistaxis is the most common complication, but which nostril is associated with a lower incidence and severity of epistaxis is still unclear.

Objective: When both nostrils are patent, to determine the preferred nostril for nasotracheal intubation under general anaesthesia.

Design: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs). The primary outcome was the incidence of epistaxis and the secondary outcomes included the incidence of severe epistaxis, the time required to pass the tube through the nasal passage and total intubation time.

Data Sources: PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials were searched from database inception to 1 March 2020.

Eligibility Criteria: The only studies included were RCTs comparing epistaxis related to nasotracheal intubation via right or left nostril, in adult surgery patients undergoing general anaesthesia.

Results: Ten RCTs with 1658 patients were included. Compared with the left nostril, intubation via the right nostril was associated with a significantly lower incidence of epistaxis: risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were 0.78 (0.62 to 0.99), P = 0.04: a lower incidence of severe epistaxis (five studies, n=923), RR 0.40 (0.22 to 0.75), P = 0.004: and a shorter intubation time (three studies, n=345), mean difference -7.28 (-14.40 to -0.16) seconds, P = 0.05. In two studies (n=310), no significant difference between the right and left nostril was observed in the time to pass the tube through the nasal passages, mean difference -0.59 (-1.95 to 0.77) s, P = 0.40.

Conclusion: On the basis of the current available evidence, when both nostrils are patent, the right nostril is more appropriate for nasotracheal intubation, with a lower incidence and severity of epistaxis and faster intubation time.

Trial Registration: The study protocol has been registered in PROSPERO (CRD42020169949).

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0000000000001462DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

nasotracheal intubation
20
lower incidence
16
left nostril
12
epistaxis
9
nostril
8
intubation nostril
8
systematic review
8
review meta-analysis
8
intubation
8
patients undergoing
8

Similar Publications

Panfacial fractures are complex fractures involving multiple regions of the facial skeleton and may require multiple surgeries over a relatively short period. They are often associated with polytrauma and other injuries including neurotrauma, which require either immediate (ATLS) airway management, prolonged intubation, or repeated intubations for staged surgeries. The choice of airway for the surgical management of these fractures is difficult, as an assessment of the occlusion is required, and the central nasal complex and/or skull base may be involved, making classical orotracheal or nasotracheal intubation problematic.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Airway management in patients with advanced ankylosing spondylitis (AS) presents a unique challenge due to possible cervical spine deformities that restrict neck mobility and affect access to the airway. Traditional airway management strategies, such as direct laryngoscopy and even fiberoptic intubation, are often rendered ineffective due to these anatomical limitations. Furthermore, surgical options like tracheostomy can be infeasible in cases with significant neck deformities, necessitating alternative approaches.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The transport of intubated patients is a common but high-risk scenario for air medical transport crews. In the case presented, a physician-nurse HEMS crew responded for the interfacility transfer of a patient with severe angioedema who had undergone awake fiberoptic nasotracheal intubation in the referring emergency department. The endotracheal tube had been damaged, however, and could not be adequately secured for transport.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Nasotracheal intubation is crucial for many oral and maxillofacial surgery procedures; however, it presents more challenges than orotracheal intubation and requires a higher level of training, along with various execution options. The routine use of an endotracheal tube (ETT)-first nasal fiberoptic intubation protocol is recommended, specifically in cases where orotracheal intubation is not possible or feasible. In this proposed technique, 137 randomly selected patients underwent fiberoptic nasotracheal intubation for general anesthesia utilizing a strict ETT first protocol.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Does intubation while observing the glottis with a fiberoptic scope reduce postoperative sore throat?

BMC Anesthesiol

November 2024

Department of Dental Anesthesiology, Graduate School of Dental Science, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.

Introduction: In oral maxillofacial surgery, the nasal tracheal tube is mostly used to provide a better surgical field for oral, head and neck operations. Postoperative sore throat and hoarseness are common following tracheal intubation, with an incidence of 11-55%. Then, we previously reported advantage technique of fiberoptic scope to decrease the risk which the tip of the tube is visualized as the tube is advanced which helps avoid impingement of the tube.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!