Systems of Care in Cardiogenic Shock.

Front Cardiovasc Med

Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY, United States.

Published: September 2021

Outcomes for cardiogenic shock (CS) patients remain relatively poor despite significant advancements in primary percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) and temporary circulatory support (TCS) technologies. Mortality from CS shows great disparities that seem to reflect large variations in access to care and physician practice patterns. Recent reports of different models to standardize care in CS have shown considerable potential at improving outcomes. The creation of regional, integrated, 3-tiered systems, would facilitate standardized interventions and equitable access to care. Multidisciplinary CS teams at Level I centers would direct care in a hub-and-spoke model through jointly developed protocols and real-time shared decision making. Levels II and III centers would provide early access to life-saving therapies and safe transfer to designated hub centers. In regions with large geographical distances, the implementation of telemedicine-cardiac intensive care unit (CICU) care can be an important resource for the creation of effective systems of care.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8489379PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2021.712594DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

systems care
8
cardiogenic shock
8
access care
8
care
7
care cardiogenic
4
shock outcomes
4
outcomes cardiogenic
4
shock patients
4
patients remain
4
remain poor
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!