AI Article Synopsis

  • The PRECISE-DAPT score is used to predict major bleeding risks in patients after heart attack treatment but its effectiveness in real-world scenarios is uncertain.
  • A large study involving over 66,000 patients found that a high PRECISE-DAPT score indicates a greater risk of major bleeding, particularly for those scoring 25 or higher.
  • However, the score is less reliable for patients with existing bleeding risks, like the elderly or underweight individuals, showing poor ability to differentiate between low and high-risk bleeding categories in these groups.

Article Abstract

Background The Predicting Bleeding Complications in Patients Undergoing Stent Implantation and Subsequent Dual Antiplatelet Therapy (PRECISE-DAPT) score has been shown to predict out-of-hospital major bleeding after myocardial infarction treated with percutaneous coronary intervention and dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). However, large validation studies have been scarce and the discriminative ability for patients with a preexisting bleeding risk factor (elderly, underweight, women, anemia, kidney dysfunction, or cancer) in a real-world setting is unknown. Methods and Results Patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for myocardial infarction between 2008 and 2017 were included from the SWEDEHEART (Swedish Web System for Enhancement of Evidence-Based Care in Heart Disease Evaluated According to Recommended Therapies) registry (n=66 295). The predictive value of the PRECISE-DAPT score for rehospitalization with major bleeding during dual antiplatelet therapy was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic analyses. A high PRECISE-DAPT score (≥25; n=13 894) was associated with increased risk of major bleeding (3.9% versus 1.8%; hazard ratio [HR], 2.2; 95% CI, 2.0-2.5; <0.001) compared with a non-high score (<25; n=52 401). The score demonstrated a c-statistic of 0.64 (95% CI, 0.63-0.66). The discriminative ability of the score to further stratify bleeding risk in patients with preexisting bleeding risk factors was poor, especially in patients who are elderly (c-statistic=0.57; 95% CI, 0.55-0.60) or underweight (c-statistic=0.56; 95% CI, 0.51-0.61), for whom a non-high PRECISE-DAPT score was associated with similar bleeding risk as a high PRECISE-DAPT score in the general myocardial infarction population. Conclusions In this nationwide population-based study, the PRECISE-DAPT score performed moderately in the general myocardial infarction population and poorly in patients with preexisting bleeding risk factors, where its usefulness seems limited.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8751860PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.121.020974DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

precise-dapt score
16
dual antiplatelet
12
antiplatelet therapy
12
major bleeding
12
patients undergoing
8
myocardial infarction
8
percutaneous coronary
8
coronary intervention
8
bleeding
5
validation 4-item
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!