AI Article Synopsis

  • This study investigates how various restorative materials and resin cements impact stress distribution in endodontically treated posterior endocrowns.
  • A 3D finite element analysis was used to simulate the first mandibular molar, testing three restorative materials and two cement types under simulated chewing conditions.
  • Results indicate that using EMX ceramic with NX3 cement minimizes failure risk and better protects dental structures compared to other combinations.

Article Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the influence of different types of restorative materials and resin cements on the stress distribution in the regions of the restoration, cement layer and dental remnant in endodontically treated posterior endocrowns.

Methods: A 3D finite element analysis (FEA) model of the first mandibular molar that was restored with an endocrown designed by computer-aided design (CAD) software was generated. Three kinds of restorative materials (Vita Enamic (VE), IPS e.max CAD (EMX) and Grandio blocs (GR)) and two types of cementing materials (NX3 and Maxcem Elite Chroma (MX)) were analysed with such a model. The food layer was also designed before vertical (600 N) forces were applied to simulate physiological masticatory conditions. Thermal expansion was used to simulate the polymerization shrinkage effects of cement layers. The results were obtained by colorimetric graphs of the maximum principal stress in the restoration and tooth remnant. The failure risk of the cement layer was also calculated based on the normal stress.

Results: The elastic modulus was positively correlated with the tensile stress peak values in the restoration, mainly at the intaglio surface. However, in the cervical enamel and cement layer, restorative material with a higher elastic modulus generated lower peak stress values. The cement with a higher elastic modulus resulted in higher stress peak values inside the cement layer. The combination of EMX (restorative material) and NX3 (cement material) in the cement layer resulted in the lowest failure risk.

Significance: The ceramic material EMX with a higher elastic modulus appeared to be more effective at protecting the cement layer and residual enamel tissue. Based on the analysis of the failure risk of the cement layer, the combination of EMX and NX3 was recommended as an optional material for endocrowns for endodontically treated posterior teeth.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8491409PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-021-01865-wDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cement layer
28
elastic modulus
16
restorative material
12
higher elastic
12
cement
11
material cement
8
stress distribution
8
finite element
8
element analysis
8
restorative materials
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!