Patient Partners in Continuing Professional Development: Experience Developing an End-of-Life Care Program for Family Physicians.

J Contin Educ Health Prof

Ms. Tajani: Learning & Curriculum Manager, Division of Continuing Professional Development, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada . Dr. Towle: Co-Director Patient & Community Partnership for Education, Office of UBC Health & Associate Professor, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada . Ms. Beamish: Senior Manager, Rural CPD, Division of Continuing Professional Development, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada . Dr. Bluman: Executive Medical Director, Continuing Professional Development & Clinical Professor, Department of Family Practice, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada .

Published: October 2021

Involvement of patients in continuing professional development (CPD) is less developed than in health professional education at undergraduate or postgraduate levels. Although patients are sometimes involved in delivering CPD, they are less likely to be involved in education planning. At our institution, patients have sometimes acted as consultants in the design of CPD. The problem we address is how to engage patients as partners throughout the design process. We applied principles of authentic patient engagement and lessons learned from patient involvement in undergraduate health professional education to the design of CPD for family physicians. We created a partnership between the CPD Office and Patient and Community Partnership for Education, a unit with a history of patient involvement in the education of health professional students. Practices for meaningful involvement were identified through literature review, environmental scan, and interviewing key informants, including patients involved in health professional education at the university. These principles and practices were applied to the development of a CPD module on end-of-life care. Patient partners contributed new perspectives and some CPD providers reassessed components of their own practice as a result. Lessons learned include the need for stakeholder buy-in; mechanisms to identify those patients best able to contribute expertise; ways to facilitate involvement that work for both patients and CPD providers; the importance of feedback mechanisms to patient partners; and recognition for patient contributions. CPD offices should view integration of patient partners in program planning as an opportunity to engage in ongoing quality improvement.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CEH.0000000000000392DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

patient partners
16
health professional
16
professional education
12
patient
9
cpd
9
continuing professional
8
professional development
8
end-of-life care
8
family physicians
8
development cpd
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!