The time of death in Dutch court; using the Daubert criteria to evaluate methods to estimate the PMI used in court.

Leg Med (Tokyo)

Faculty of Law and Criminology, Maastricht University, Minderbroedersberg 4-6, 6211 LK Maastricht, the Netherlands; Ars Cogniscendi Foundation for Legal and Forensic Medicine, Wezep, the Netherlands.

Published: November 2021

When a capital crime is committed the post-mortem interval (PMI) is of particular importance in investigating a suspect's alibi in court. A forensic expert can use different methods to estimate the PMI. This research focuses on who is considered an expert in court and whether the methods used to estimate the PMI are reliable. In this study, the methods used to estimate the PMI and the experts consulted, available in Dutch jurisprudence, in the period 2010-2019 were investigated. Ninety-four judicial cases were included and multiple experts and methods of estimating the PMI were found. As part of this study, the methods that were used to estimate the PMI in court were subjected to the Daubert criteria. Of these methods, only the Henssge nomogram and entomological methods met the Daubert criteria. However, the methods are only useful when applied by the right forensic expert and in the right manner. Unfortunately, this was not always the case.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.legalmed.2021.101970DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

methods estimate
20
estimate pmi
20
daubert criteria
12
methods
9
pmi court
8
forensic expert
8
study methods
8
criteria methods
8
pmi
7
court
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!