A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Ultrasound assessment of the inferior vena cava in children: A comparison of sub-xiphoid and right lateral coronal views. | LitMetric

Objectives: The inferior vena cava collapsibility index (IVCCI) has been used to assess the respiratory variation of the inferior vena cava (IVC) diameter and hence intravascular volume. The sub-xiphoid view (SXV) is the standard view to evaluate the IVC. The right lateral transabdominal view (RLV) has been shown in adults to be an alternative view to evaluate the IVC when the SXV is not feasible. The aim of the study was to compare IVC dimensions from these two views and thus determine whether the RLV view can be used instead of the SXV in pediatric patients.

Methods: We conducted a single-center prospective observational crossover study. Study subjects were ASA physical status 1-2 children, 1-12 years of age scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia. Anesthesia was maintained by mask with spontaneous ventilation with end-tidal sevoflurane at 2%-5% after the induction of anesthesia. IVCCI was measured using M-mode in both the SXV and RLV.

Results: The study cohort included 50 children with a mean age of 5.1 years. The median value for the IVCCI-sx was 0.45 (IQR: 0.28-0.70) while the IVCCI-rl was 0.30 (0.19-0.5). The mean difference between the two groups was 0.12 (95% CI: 0.177-0.066, p < .001, two-tailed paired t-test). Spearman's rank correlation coefficient was 0.66. The univariate linear regression model was IVCCIsx = 0.21 + 0.77 × IVCCIrl.

Conclusions: IVCCIrl was lower than IVCCIsx. IVCCI measured from the right lateral view tended to overestimate the patient's fluid-responsiveness and therefore these two values are not interchangeable.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcu.23061DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

inferior vena
12
vena cava
12
view sxv
8
view evaluate
8
evaluate ivc
8
view
5
ultrasound assessment
4
assessment inferior
4
cava children
4
children comparison
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!