Notification that new names of prokaryotes, new combinations, and new taxonomic opinions have appeared in volume 71, part 6 of the IJSEM.

Int J Syst Evol Microbiol

Department of Microbiology & Molecular Genetics, Biomedical Physical Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824-4320, USA.

Published: October 2021

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.004956DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

notification names
4
names prokaryotes
4
prokaryotes combinations
4
combinations taxonomic
4
taxonomic opinions
4
opinions appeared
4
appeared volume
4
volume ijsem
4
notification
1
prokaryotes
1

Similar Publications

The qualified presumption of safety (QPS) process was developed to provide a safety assessment approach for microorganisms intended for use in food or feed chains. In the period covered by this Statement, no new information was found that would change the status of previously recommended QPS taxonomic units (TUs). The TUs in the QPS list were updated based on a verification, against their respective authoritative databases, of the correctness of the names and completeness of synonyms.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Challenges facing physicians in death certification of under-five mortality in Egypt.

BMC Health Serv Res

November 2024

Health Specialist in UNICEF Egypt CO, Cairo, Egypt.

Background: Improving death certification of Under 5 Mortality (U5M) is an important pre-requisite for improving child health. This study aimed to obtain a clear and comprehensive understanding of the process of death registration of U5M and address the challenges of accurate certification faced by physicians at hospitals and health offices.

Methods: A qualitative descriptive study was performed by conducting 10 Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) with physicians who are actively involved in the certification of U5M.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: In 2021, a survey was conducted among doctors and nurses at Landspítali Iceland University Hospital (LIUH) regarding their views on medical assistance in dying (MAID) and the underlying arguments, the inclusion criteria and modality of implementation. Surveys on identically defined study groups in 1995 and 2010 were used for comparison.

Methods: The survey was sent to 357 doctors and 516 nurses working at LIUH.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!