Background: The present meta-analysis aims to conduct a systematic comparative study of the curative effects of Percutaneous Endoscopic Transforaminal Discectomy (PETD) and Percutaneous Endoscopic Interlaminar Discectomy (PEID) when used to treat Lumbar Disc Herniation (LDH).
Methods: The following online databases will be searched to find articles related to treating of LDH using PETD and PEID, namely PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane databases, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, WanFang Database, and Web of Science. The search will include all articles published from inception until August 2021. Articles will be included according to the inclusion criteria. Two authors will independently screen and assess the quality of each study. RevMan (version 5.3) will be adopted to complete data analysis and evaluate the statistical significance of each operating technique in various outcomes.
Results: The present meta-analysis will evaluate the curative effects of using PETD and PEID to treat LDH patients.
Conclusion: Compare the clinical efficiency of PETD and PEID as therapy for LDH with postoperative hypoesthesia, complications in surgical site wounds, nerve root injury, transfer to open surgery, recurrence, partial decompression, and other complications. The comparative analysis will help determine the difference between the 2 surgical methods of PETD and PEID for treating LDH.
Osf Registration Number: August 2, 2021.osf.io/hr964. (https://osf.io/hr964/).
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8483854 | PMC |
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000027089 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
A comparative study of transforaminal and interlaminar approaches in percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for L5-S1 disc Herniation: Systematic review.
J Clin Neurosci
January 2025
Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Brawijaya University/Saiful Anwar General Hospital, Malang, East Java, Indonesia.
Background: Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy (PELD) is a leading minimally invasive technique for lumbar disc herniation (LDH). The two primary approaches, transforaminal (PETD) and interlaminar (PEID), each present distinct advantages and challenges in treating L5-S1 LDH. This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of these two approaches.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEffectiveness of transforaminal approach spinal endoscopy in the treatment of patients with lumbar disc herniation and the factors affecting its efficacy.
Am J Transl Res
May 2024
Department of Orthopedics, Nanlang Branch of Zhongshan People's Hospital Zhongshan 528451, Guangdong, China.
Objective: To compare the surgical metrics, improvement of functional scores, and clinical efficacy of percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal discectomy (PETD) and percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy (PEID) and to analyze the independent risk factors affecting the therapeutic efficacy of PETD.
Methods: The clinical data of LDH (lumbar disc herniation) patients who underwent treatment in Shaanxi Provincial Nuclear Industry 215 Hospital from May 2020 to May 2022 were retrospectively collected, including 70 PEID cases and 74 PETD cases. The two groups were compared in terms of surgical indexes, such as operation time and bleeding volume, as well as changes in functional scores, such as preoperative and postoperative Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI).
[Effect and complication among different kinds of spinal endoscopic surgery for lumbar disc herniation].
Zhongguo Gu Shang
March 2024
Department of Orthopaedics, the First People's Hospital of Zigong, Zigong 643000, Sichuan, China.
Objective: To compare clinical efficacy and complication rate of percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal discectomy(PETD),percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy (PEID) and unilateral biportal endoscopic (UBE) in treating single-segment lumbar disc herniation(LDH).
Methods: From October 2019 to August 2021,121 LDH patients with single-segment treated by spinal endoscopy were retrospectively analyzed and divided into three groups. In PETD group,there were 48 patients,including 19 males and 29 females,aged from 18 to 72 years old with an average of (44.
Endoscopic Revision Strategies and Outcomes for Recurrent L4/5 Disc Herniation After Percutaneous Endoscopic Transforaminal Discectomy.
J Pain Res
February 2024
Department of Spinal Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, People's Republic of China.
Objective: We explore the endoscopic revision and surgical techniques for L4/5 recurrent disc herniation (rLDH) after percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal discectomy (PETD).
Methods: A retrospective study was conducted. From January 2016 to September 2022, 96 patients who underwent percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for L4/5 rLDH after PETD were enrolled in the study.
Hidden blood loss in three different endoscopic spinal procedures for lumbar disc herniation.
Ann Med Surg (Lond)
February 2024
Department of Orthopedics, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Xicheng District, China.
Purpose: This study compared hidden blood loss (HBL) among three different endoscopic spinal procedures and investigated its risk factors.
Patients And Methods: This single-centre retrospective analysis collected data from consecutive hospitalized patients with single-segment lumbar disc herniation (LDH) undergoing unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy (UBE), percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal discectomy (PETD), or percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy (PEID) from December 2020 to October 2022. HBL was calculated using Nadler's and Gross's formulas.
Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!