Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Aim Of The Study: Gradual reintegration has been an established tool for return to work for many years. However, the effect is unclear in patients with oncological diseases. The objective of this study was to determine the significance of gradual reintegration after inpatient medical rehabilitation.
Methods: Within the framework of a cohort study, data of 787 patients who underwent medical rehabilitation at Clinic Reinhardshöhe from 06/2012 to 06/2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were routinely contacted 6 months after the end of medical rehabilitation and asked about their occupational situation. The subjective employment prognosis stated by the patient was recorded using the Würzburg Screening Questionnaire.
Results: 485/787 patients (62%) had undergone gradual reintegration, 302/787 patients (38%) had not. At the time of the follow-up survey, 456/485 patients with gradual reintegration had returned to work, while only 155/302 patients in the group without gradual reintegration had done so (94 vs. 51%; p<0.001). As a positive predictor of return to work, gradual reintegration was found to be by far the strongest factor (OR 20.21; 95% CI 8.605-47.065).
Conclusion: Although this is a retrospective analysis of routine data, gradual reintegration turns out to be a very strong predictor of return to work. Nonuse of stWE is likely influenced by other medical or personal factors not controlled for in our study. This may have led to overestimation of the effect.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1578-1449 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!