AI Article Synopsis

  • This study investigates whether cell blocks from effusions can serve as a reliable alternative to biopsies in determining the nature of mesothelial conditions in dogs.
  • An immunohistochemical (IHC) panel was used to differentiate between hyperplastic mesothelium, mesothelioma, and carcinoma in canine samples.
  • Results indicated that while some IHC markers (like WT1 and vimentin) showed meaningful correlations between cell blocks and biopsies, further research with larger sample sizes is needed for conclusive results.

Article Abstract

Background: Determining the cause of effusions is challenging and might require a biopsy. Whether cell blocks from effusions are representative of biopsies requires investigation. A previously developed immunohistochemical panel aids in the differentiation of hyperplastic and neoplastic mesothelium in canine biopsies but has not been investigated in effusions.

Objectives: The study aimed to assess cell blocks as an alternative to biopsies and determine whether immunohistochemistry helps distinguish hyperplastic mesothelium, mesothelioma, and carcinoma.

Methods: Effusions and biopsies were collected from five dogs with mesothelial hyperplasia (group MH), six with mesothelioma (group M), and five with carcinoma (group C). Immunohistochemistry (IHC) for cytokeratin, vimentin, Wilm's tumor protein 1 (WT1), desmin, glucose transporter 1 (GLUT1), and insulin-like growth factor II mRNA-binding protein 3 (IMP3) was performed. Sections were scored for staining intensity and the percentage of positively stained cells.

Results: In paired cell blocks and biopsies, vimentin and WT1 staining were positively correlated for intensity and the percentage of positive cells, although not all paired results were identical. The intensity of IMP3 staining in cell blocks was higher in group M than in group C (P = 0.012), and WT1 staining was higher in group MH than in group C (P = 0.020). For biopsies, the intensity of WT1 staining was higher in group MH than in group C (P = 0.031). In group C, WT1 was negative in all cell blocks and biopsies, and desmin was negative in four of five cases.

Conclusions: IHC results for the cell blocks and biopsies were comparable for potentially useful markers, such as WT1, which helped discriminate between groups. IHC provided additional information, although results were not always definitive. Further studies on a larger population are required.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/vcp.13002DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cell blocks
24
blocks biopsies
12
wt1 staining
12
higher group
12
group group
12
group
10
mesothelial hyperplasia
8
biopsies
8
intensity percentage
8
staining higher
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!