The purpose of this study was to evaluate the validity and reliability of a tire pressure sensor (TPS) cycling power meter against a gold standard (SRM) during indoor cycling. Twelve recreationally active participants completed eight trials of 90 s of cycling at different pedaling and gearing combinations on an indoor hybrid roller. Power output (PO) was simultaneously calculated via TPS and SRM. The analysis compared the paired 1 s PO and 1 min average PO per trial between devices. Agreement was assessed by correlation, linear regression, inferential statistics, effect size, and Bland-Altman LoA. Reliability was assessed by ICC and CV comparison. TPS showed near-perfect correlation with SRM in 1 s ( = 0.97, < 0.001) and 1-min data ( = 0.99, < 0.001). Differences in paired 1 s data were statistically significant ( = 0.04), but of a trivial magnitude ( = 0.05). There was no significant main effect for device (F(1,9) = 0.05, = 0.83, ηp2 = 0.97) in 1 min data and no statistical differences between devices by trial in post hoc analysis ( < 0.01-0.98; < 0.01-0.93). Bias and LoA were -0.21 ± 16.77 W for the 1 min data. Mean TPS bias ranged from 3.37% to 7.81% of the measured SRM mean PO per trial. Linear regression SEE was 7.55 W for 1 min TPS prediction of SRM. ICC across trials was 0.96. No statistical difference ( = 0.09-0.11) in TPS CV (3.6-5.0%) and SRM CV (4.3-4.7%). The TPS is a valid and reliable power meter for estimating average indoor PO for time periods equal to or greater than 1 min and may have acceptable sensitivity to detect changes under less stringent criteria (±5%).
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8470436 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21186117 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!