A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 143

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 143
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 209
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 994
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3134
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 574
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 488
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Feasibility of Systems Support Mapping to guide patient-driven health self-management in colorectal cancer survivors. | LitMetric

Objective: To evaluate feasibility of System Support Mapping (MAP), a systems thinking activity that involves creating a diagram of existing self-management activities (e.g. symptom management, health behaviors) to facilitate autonomous engagement in optimal self-management.

Design: One-arm pilot study of MAP in colorectal cancer survivors (NCT03520283).

Main Outcome Measures: Feasibility of recruitment and retention (primary outcome), acceptability, and outcome variability over time.

Results: We enrolled 24 of 66 cancer survivors approached (36%) and 20 completed follow-up (83%). Key reasons for declining participation included: not interested ( = 18), did not perceive a need ( = 9), and emotional distress/overwhelmed ( = 7). Most participants reported that MAP was acceptable (e.g. 80% liked MAP quite a bit/very much). Exploratory analyses revealed a -4.68 point reduction in fatigue from before to 2 weeks after MAP exceeding a minimally important difference ( = -0.68). There were also improvements in patient autonomy ( = 0.63), self-efficacy (for managing symptoms:  = 0.56, for managing chronic disease:  = 0.44), psychological stress ( = -0.45), anxiety ( = -0.34), sleep disturbance ( = -0.29) and pain ( = -0.32). Qualitative feedback enhanced interpretation of results.

Conclusions: MAP feasibility in colorectal cancer survivors was mixed, predominantly because many patients did not perceive a need for this approach. MAP was acceptable among participants and showed promise for improving health outcomes.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8957632PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2021.1979549DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cancer survivors
16
colorectal cancer
12
support mapping
8
map acceptable
8
map
7
feasibility
4
feasibility systems
4
systems support
4
mapping guide
4
guide patient-driven
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!