With 1,153 pairs of bitewing radiographs representing data collected from 145 patients, we determined that the average positive bitewing interval was 17.7 months, which is consistent with published recommendations of 12- to 24-month intervals.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

evaluation bitewing
4
bitewing intervals
4
intervals children
4
children 1153
4
1153 pairs
4
pairs bitewing
4
bitewing radiographs
4
radiographs representing
4
representing data
4
data collected
4

Similar Publications

The combination of different methods has been advocated to increase sensitivity in detecting secondary caries lesions. This cross-sectional study compared the detection of caries lesions around posterior restorations and treatment decisions using bitewing radiographs alone or in combination with clinical information from patient records. The radiographs (n = 212) were randomly distributed into two sequences for assessment across two phases, with a wash-out period of two weeks.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the accuracy of near-infrared imaging (NIRI) generated by the iTero Element 5D scanner for detecting proximal caries lesions in deciduous molars, compared with visual inspection (VI), bitewing radiography (BW) and histological examination (HT) (reference standard).

Methods: Sound deciduous molars and those with caries lesions (ICDAS 0 to 5) on the proximal surface were included, while teeth with marginal crest breakdown, restoration on the mentioned surfaces, or extensive dentin resorption were excluded. A total of 182 deciduous molars, divided into 91 pairs of first and second molars, were evaluated by two blinded examiners.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Bitewing examinations are critical for assessing pediatric dental health, and this study compared the radiation dose and image quality of two X-ray systems: Trophy CCX (TCCX) and Planmeca Pro X (PPX).
  • Data was collected from both real patient exams and artificial models, with experienced dentists blind-evaluating the images for quality while assessing radiation exposure using a dosimeter.
  • Results showed that TCCX provided higher-quality images but at a significantly increased radiation dose compared to PPX, suggesting a trade-off between image clarity and patient safety.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Odontomas are the most prevalent odontogenic tumors, often classified as hamartomas due to their slow growth and non-aggressive nature. Typically asymptomatic, they can obstruct the eruption of adjacent teeth. While the exact causes of odontomas remain unclear, potential factors include local trauma, infection, growth pressure, and hereditary influences.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • - The study aimed to evaluate how different monitor types and lighting conditions affect the accuracy and duration of diagnosing approximal caries from bitewing radiographs.
  • - Results showed no significant difference in diagnostic accuracy or duration, but factors like ambient light, clinical experience, and the severity of caries did impact the level of confidence in diagnoses.
  • - Overall, the findings suggest that while monitor type and lighting don't affect accuracy, they, along with other factors, influence how confident practitioners feel about their diagnoses of caries.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!