Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Chiu, LZF and Dæhlin, TE. Midfoot and ankle mechanics in block and incline heel raise exercises. J Strength Cond Res 35(12): 3308-3314, 2021-Although the heel raise exercise is performed to strengthen the calf muscles, the combination of calf muscle and ground reaction forces elicits moments that may deform the foot's longitudinal arch. The primary purpose of this investigation was to examine whether the foot muscles contribute to supporting the longitudinal arch during heel raises. The secondary purpose was to compare foot and ankle mechanical efforts between traditional block vs. 22° incline heel raises. Six women and 6 men performed heel raises with body mass plus a barbell loaded with 40% (BM + 40%) and 60% (BM + 60%) of their body mass. Three-dimensional motion analysis and force platform data were collected. The midfoot joint was evaluated from the angle between the forefoot and rearfoot (i.e., arch angle) and net joint moment, which may elevate or reduce the arch height. Midfoot joint arch elevator moment seemed to be greater for BM + 60% than BM + 40% (p < 0.05; Cohen's d = 1.24-1.61), with minimal change in arch angle (p < 0.05; Cohen's d = 0.15-0.19). Midfoot joint arch elevator and ankle plantar flexor moments seemed to be greater in incline vs. block heel raises for both loads (p < 0.05; Cohen's d = 0.58-0.67). The increase in midfoot joint arch elevator moment with trivial change in arch angle supports the hypothesis that the foot muscles contribute to longitudinal arch support during heel raises. Performing incline heel raises may be hypothesized to be more effective to stimulate foot and calf muscle adaptations than block heel raises.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000004145 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!