Objectives: The present study aimed to identify significant causes of readmission within 30 days following coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery and compare readmission incidence related to surgical site infections (SSIs) before and after implementing international recommendations for antibiotic prophylaxis.

Methods: We analyzed 2,225 CABG patients who received either guideline-directed antibiotic prophylaxis (GDAP = 568) or institutional antibiotic prophylaxis (non-GDAP = 1,657) between January 2017 and December 2019. The primary outcome was a composite of sternal wound infection (SWI) or harvest SWI. Secondary outcomes consisted of the individual components of composite end point, the incidence of in-hospital SSIs, and prolonged postoperative length of hospital stay (LOS) (>7 days). Propensity matching was used to select pairs for final comparison.

Results: Before implementing GDAP, the most frequent reason for readmission were SSIs, causing 58.2% of all readmissions within 30 days. Of 429 matched pairs, 48 patients in the GDAP group and 67 patients in the non-GDAP group were readmitted to a hospital within 30 days for any cause (11.2 vs. 15.6%, p = 0.048). We found a decreased readmission incidence for reasons related to SSIs, although these differences did not reach statistical significance (7.4 vs. 10.0%, p = 0.069). Adherence to GDAP was associated with reduced in-hospital risks of SSIs and prolonged postoperative LOS (19.6 vs. 26.6%, p = 0.015).

Conclusions: In this contemporary clinical practice study, the adherence to GDAP was an insufficient measure to decrease rehospitalization due to SSIs. The present findings warrant further investigation on factors that may contribute to SSIs development after hospital discharge.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000518403DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

coronary artery
8
artery bypass
8
readmission incidence
8
antibiotic prophylaxis
8
ssis prolonged
8
prolonged postoperative
8
adherence gdap
8
ssis
7
readmission
5
gdap
5

Similar Publications

Cardiac Positron Emission Tomography (PET) can be used for the assessment of myocardial perfusion. Compared to other cardiac imaging techniques, notably Single Photon Emission Computer Tomography (SPECT), cardiac PET offers superior image resolution, higher accuracy, quantitative measures of myocardial perfusion, lower radiation exposure, and shorter image acquisition time. However, PET tends to be costlier and less widely available than SPECT due to the specialized equipment needed for generating the necessary radiotracers.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Coronary artery disease (CAD) remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, necessitating advancements in diagnostic techniques. Coronary CT angiography (CCTA) has emerged as a pivotal non-invasive tool for evaluating coronary artery anatomy and detecting atherosclerotic plaque burden with high spatial resolution. This review explores the evolution of CCTA, highlighting its technological advancements, clinical applications, and challenges.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Which Test is Best for Pain in the Chest?

R I Med J (2013)

February 2025

Professor of Medicine, Clinician Educator, Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University; Associate Chief, Cardiology, Brown University Health Cardiovascular Institute, Providence, Rhode Island.

Chest pain is one of the most common chief complaints seen in both the emergency department (ED) and primary care settings.1,2 It is estimated that 20-40% of the general population will suffer from chest pain at some point throughout their lives.3 Interestingly although obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) prevalence has declined, chest pain as a presenting symptom has become increasingly common over the last decade.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Update in Cardiovascular Prevention: From Risk Scores to Imaging.

R I Med J (2013)

February 2025

Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Brown University, Providence RI.

Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) remains the leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. This review explores the evolving evidence base surrounding ASCVD prevention, particularly regarding nontraditional biomarkers, risk scores, and cardiovascular imaging modalities. Additionally, this review examines cardiovascular risk scores, including the PREVENT and MESA-CHD scores, which incorporate both traditional and nontraditional factors, thereby aspiring to offer a more equitable and precise risk assessment.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!