Standard diagnoses of SARS-CoV-2 infections are done by RNA extraction and real-time RT-PCR (rRT-PCR). However, the need for RNA extraction complicates testing due to increased processing time, high cost, and limited availability of commercial kits. Therefore, alternative methods for rRT-PCR detection of SARS-CoV-2 without RNA extraction were investigated. Nasopharyngeal and sputum samples were used to compare the sensitivity of three techniques: Trizol RNA extraction, thermal shock, and the direct use of samples with an RNase inhibitor. Direct, extraction-free use of primary samples plus the RNase inhibitor produced diagnostic values of 100 % sensitivity and specificity compared to standard protocols, and these findings were validated in a second, independent laboratory.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8459549PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jviromet.2021.114302DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

rna extraction
16
real-time rt-pcr
8
detection sars-cov-2
8
sputum samples
8
samples rnase
8
rnase inhibitor
8
alternative rna
4
rna extraction-free
4
extraction-free techniques
4
techniques real-time
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!