Background: Demineralization during multi-bracketed fixed orthodontic treatment is a well-known problem.

Aim: To systematically evaluate the evidence for the prevention of enamel demineralization during multi-bracketed fixed orthodontic treatment.

Design: Systematic reviews (with or without meta-analysis) that have appraised the primary studies on the prevention of demineralization during multi-bracketed fixed orthodontic treatment were searched systematically and included as per pre-defined eligibility criteria. The risk of bias of the included reviews was assessed by two authors using the ROBIS tool and AMSTAR-2 tool.

Results: Twenty-nine reviews conducted on 128 exclusive primary studies were included for the present overview; 23 of these reviews were assessed to be of a high risk of overall bias, 5 were of low risk, and 1 review was of unclear risk of bias.

Conclusions: Predominantly, the published reviews have focused on fluorides, whereas some reviews have also studied the role of casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate (CPP-ACP), reminder therapy, lasers, and sealants. Professional fluorides, sealants, reminder therapy, and lasers might be valuable interventions to prevent demineralization during orthodontic treatment based on the conclusions of reviews with high quality; however, further studies are required to elucidate the role of CPP-ACP, chlorhexidine varnish, and powered toothbrushes.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ipd.12927DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

demineralization multi-bracketed
16
multi-bracketed fixed
16
fixed orthodontic
16
orthodontic treatment
16
prevention demineralization
8
reviews
8
systematic reviews
8
primary studies
8
risk bias
8
reviews assessed
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!