Effect of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor duration on the clinical prognosis of primary percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction with no-/slow-reflow phenomenon.

Biomed Pharmacother

Department of Cardiology, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Coronary Heart Disease Prevention, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong, China. Electronic address:

Published: November 2021

Background: In patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) accompanied by the no-/slow-reflow phenomenon, the maintenance duration of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor (GPI) is controversial. We compare the efficacy and safety of short- and long-term GPI infusion in STEMI patients with the no-/slow-reflow phenomenon.

Methods: From June 2016 to December 2019, we continuously included patients with on-set STEMI who underwent pPCI, accompanied by the no-/slow-reflow, during interventional procedures at Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital and Zhuhai Golden Bay Hospital. The hemorrhage events, heart function, and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) were compared between < 24 h and ≥ 24 h GPI duration groups. The Kaplan-Meier curve was used to estimate the 1-year MACE-free survival at different GPI utility times.

Results: In total, 127 patients were divided into two groups based on the duration of tirofiban use (less and more than 24 h). There was no significant difference between two groups in terms of baseline characteristics, plaque condition, and coronary physiological function. The two groups showed similar in-hospital MACE (1 [1.85%] vs. 4 [5.48%], p = 0.394) and 1-year MACE-free survival (log-rank test p = 0.9085). The 1-year MACE remained consistent between the two groups in all subgroups of different risk factors of no-/slow-reflow. There was no significant difference in heart function and in-hospital hemorrhage events (3.7% vs. 1.37%, p = 0.179).

Conclusion: In the real world, prolonging the duration of GPI may not significantly improve the clinical outcome in patients with STEMI with no-/slow-reflow.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2021.112196DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

iib/iiia inhibitor
8
primary percutaneous
8
percutaneous coronary
8
coronary intervention
8
st-segment elevation
8
elevation myocardial
8
myocardial infarction
8
no-/slow-reflow phenomenon
8
ppci accompanied
8
accompanied no-/slow-reflow
8

Similar Publications

Article Synopsis
  • The study focuses on identifying risk factors for stent thrombosis (ST) in patients with STEMI who underwent primary PCI, using data from the TOTAL trial involving over 10,000 patients.
  • Out of the participants, 1.54% experienced ST within a year, with factors like prior heart attacks, number of stents, and certain medications influencing risk.
  • The findings suggest that while ST remains a common complication, different predictors exist for ST occurring at different times after the procedure, emphasizing the need for tailored preventive strategies.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Tirofiban is a fast-acting glycoprotein IIb-IIIa inhibitor that inhibits the final common pathway to platelet aggregation and has been studied as adjuvant therapy for acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Since the prior meta-analysis new randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have been published. This meta-analysis aimed to update the current knowledge on the efficacy of tirofiban for patients with AIS not submitted to reperfusion therapies.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonist tirofiban has been shown to prevent thromboembolic events during endovascular procedures, but the benefits and risks of its prophylactic early intraprocedural administration for stand-alone coil embolization of acutely ruptured aneurysms are still unclear. We conducted a retrospective single-center analysis of patients treated for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage with stand-alone coil embolization. Two study cohorts were compared according to the primary prophylactic antithrombotic medication during the procedure: patients receiving only intravenous heparin (HEP) versus patients receiving tirofiban in addition to heparin prior to final aneurysm obliteration (HEP + TF).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Cangrelor, an intravenous P2Y12-receptor inhibitor, is compared to traditional antithrombotic medications like eptifibatide in patients undergoing endovascular thrombectomies (EVTs), with previous data being insufficient for direct comparison.
  • A study reviewed clinical data from 1010 EVT patients who received either cangrelor or eptifibatide to assess safety and efficacy, focusing on outcomes like hemorrhagic conversion and functional status using scales like the mRS and NIHSS.
  • Results showed that cangrelor was linked to a lower risk of hemorrhagic conversion and better functional outcomes at discharge and follow-up, indicating its potential benefits over GPIs in this specific medical context
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Increased platelet activity is a risk factor of thrombotic events in cardiovascular patients. We studied the relationship between platelet function, platelet size, and the content of reticulated platelets (RP) in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD, n = 55) and acute coronary syndrome (ACS, n = 95) receiving acetylsalicylic acid + clopidogrel or ticagrelor, respectively. The control group consisted of patients with risk factors for CHD, but with no CHD/ACS and free of antiplatelet drugs (n = 66).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!