A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Is the use of augmented reality-assisted surgery beneficial in urological education? A systematic review. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • - The systematic review investigates the use of Google Glass in urology operating theaters specifically for enhancing surgical education, excluding unrelated studies and non-English articles.
  • - Three studies were identified, all of which received positive feedback from trainees who saw potential for the technology in future educational settings, though they also noted drawbacks like battery life and cost.
  • - The findings suggest that Google Glass has significant potential for surgical training in urology, but further research with more diverse operations is needed to solidify its effectiveness.

Article Abstract

Background: Google Glass is an optical head-mounted display that has been used in multiple medical and surgical settings to enhance delivery of education and training. This systematic review focuses solely on the use of this technology in urology operating theaters for the purpose of surgical education.

Materials And Methods: A systematic search strategy was employed using EMBASE (1996-2019), Medline (1946-2019) and PubMed. Search terms included optical head-mounted displays, Google Glass and urological surgical training. Use of this technology in a nonurological setting, nonteaching sessions, case reports, reviews, editorials, abstracts, and articles not in English were rejected. Three studies were identified following the exclusion criteria.

Results: All 3 studies received positive feedback from trainees regarding this technology in relation to enhanced surgical education. In addition, in all studies the trainees felt the technology had a place for educational training in the future. All studies described disadvantages to the technology as well including battery life, comfort, and cost.

Conclusions: Studies describe a big potential for Google Glass and similar head-mounted devices for the role of surgical training in urology, however, larger studies looking at more varied operations can help reinforce this viewpoint.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8451320PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CU9.0000000000000036DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

google glass
12
systematic review
8
optical head-mounted
8
surgical training
8
studies
6
surgical
5
technology
5
augmented reality-assisted
4
reality-assisted surgery
4
surgery beneficial
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!